Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th October 2004, 01:51 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany, Clausthal
Default Would this work as a xover?

Would this work as an balanced active crossover?Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2004, 06:42 PM   #2
azira is offline azira  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Near Seattle
Well, without analyzing it in better detail I could add a few comments. Firstly, it's only a first order passive network being buffered by active elements. This means your crossover point will be exactly what you set it at but pretty lame slopes compared to a basic opamp based active xo. A typical active xo uses the crossover network in the feedback path to increase the stop band drop off. You could change your crossover to a higher order between your buffers easily.

I don't understand the 100nF input caps on the low section. I don't think you want them.

Secondly, since you're not trying to make this crossover your current buffering stage, your rails can be a lot lower. I expect you'll only be dealing with line level signals so you should use +/-10 or even +/- 7 volts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2004, 07:29 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany, Clausthal
Thanks for reply. My experimenting with passive crossovers on these speakers http://home.tu-clausthal.de/~tpa/VotT/IMAGE0056.JPG told me something like first order on the tweeter and second order for bass sounded better than higher orders.

The 100nf is not accidently there, i want a slope at ~ 30Hz to keep lower frequencys away from the speaker.

For the voltage: would the higher voltage do any harm?

To make the low pass network 2nd order between the followers, i simply add another RC ? So it looks 5k1/47nF/5k1/47nF ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2004, 08:40 PM   #4
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
The 530 is a pretty rugged part, so you would only have to
watch your dissipation on it and the bias resistors.

And of course it's fairly easy to add more poles. You can use
a simulator or just experiment to get what you want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2004, 09:26 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany, Clausthal
Thanks for the comment, in fact i plan to use the 510, but the software had none, so i had to draw 530 instead. I expect not much difference in the power they can take.

So i expect this idea for a simple line level crossover is ok and i can build it without changes, expect of course i will adjust the RC networks to my speakers.

I will report when it works.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
could you make a transformerless short ribbon work with a series Xover Puggie Planars & Exotics 6 2nd July 2013 05:39 PM
Xover jwatts Planars & Exotics 0 8th February 2005 05:01 PM
xover question; will this work? matjans Multi-Way 7 1st June 2004 12:29 PM
active xover and sub problem! doesn't work!! trespasser_guy Multi-Way 5 1st May 2003 05:05 PM
Will this Bi-amp Xover idea work? chris ma Solid State 5 23rd April 2003 08:31 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2