|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
I have built many many versions and clones of Alephs (and Zens) and I found that (even though the quality changes) the character of the sound does not change. Is it simply the charachter of MOSFET and simple gain stage, or is there any probability that the charachter will be different if I use different MOSFET? I only use IRFP250 from UPSs (Mostly IR).
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
The IRF250 and P250 does sound different that an IRF240,
and while much of it is attributable to the larger die size, making the 250 equivalent to a couple of 240's in parallel, after you equalize that out, there is still a subjective difference. We happen to be working with that issue at the moment since in a few years we will be running out of 240's in TO-3 packages but have an additional supply of 250's in TO-3's. No doubt it will take some time to iron out. That said, there is a strong family resemblence between all the Alephs except the 0, 0s, and 1.0, which had 3 gain stages instead of 2. The Alephs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 1.2 were virtually identical except for output stage size, bias, and power supply. These three elements created the differences you hear, although it is not entirely clear how much is the contribution of each. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Part of the sound character is due to the circuit being class A. Part of it's due to it being single-ended, as opposed to any of the usual push-pull arrangements (complementary, quasi-, etc.). And, of course, the gain devices play a part.
One thing that I'd like to do someday is to play with different caps in the circuit. I've been using the Panasonic FC series, but there are others out there. As it happens, any audio time I get in the near future is likely to be taken up with an Aleph-X variant I've been meditating on...not to mention the usual backlog of other ideas, including a phono stage and preamp. Now, if only things would quit breaking, requiring fixing, I might be able to get something done. Hah! As though that would ever happen. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wroclaw
|
Nelson,
Is there a sonic diffrance between IRF244 (as in original Aleph) and IRFP240? Also,have you tried any other brand/type that comes close to the sound of IR IRF244 while designing Aleph series of amplifiers? Bartek |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Nelson,
What is the difference in the rise time between Aleph’s say 2 and the 1.2. Not having an Aleph 2, I can only guess that the 1.2 is just a little slower due to the input capacitance. Do you feel like that is the main difference in the sound of the amps?
__________________
Jim W. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Thanks Nelson and Grey,
Aleph 0 series if I'm not mistaken (sorry for not doing the homework) is not the DIY amp as I think I haven't seen the circuit. And it is high power amp with character similar towards A40? As with transistor case, I don't know but I think I have always like the sound of TO-3 better. I like the smaller output devices (with the same amount of bias current) but it gets more difficult to expand the bottom end. Grey, I don't think that caps matter much in Alephs. The output sensing circuit is indeed contribute to the coloration, but I found that short path does matter. I don't know how come but once I put the R and C close to the MPSA and long cable to the output, and I had to fix that. I prefer to remove those circuit though, but then I need too much current to satisfy my ears on the bottom end. The hi-end highs is even more difficult to achieve. It seems that the amp will get better with more current, without point of diminishing return. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
Quote:
bandwidth. I think most of the differences come from higher bias current and higher transconductance in the output stage. |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Nelson,
That is interesting that the output transconductance along with the open loop BW has that effect. So do you feel that this is true for the majority of MOSFET amplifiers designs? Just speaker from your experience. I know from your previous posts that the amp sound better when biased hard. If I connect several thermal couples to MOSFETs or heat sinks what do you feel is the max safe temperature I can run a TO247 at. I know this stuff is in the data book, however I think you expertise in this area is based on fact more than their imperial data.
__________________
Jim W. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wroclaw
|
Quote:
Bartek |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Alephs for a bi-amp configuration | Sony | Pass Labs | 2 | 12th January 2005 06:20 PM |
| Any old alephs | dhole | Pass Labs | 1 | 10th December 2004 07:33 PM |
| Different values of C7 (CE) in Alephs | Josep | Pass Labs | 3 | 4th February 2003 05:28 PM |
| what are the differences between the different alephs? | Bricolo | Pass Labs | 19 | 31st December 2002 04:48 AM |
| Parralleled Alephs | audionut | Pass Labs | 6 | 22nd November 2002 04:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11985 seconds (73.77% PHP - 26.23% MySQL) with 10 queries |