|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
The one and only
|
Of course a chip amp is very versatile. This version inverts
the input polarities and accomplishes the same thing. Notice the nested loops, and the resistor in the center which is the SS connection. www.passlabs.com/np/GC-SS-3a.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, National >does< call them 'smart transistors', and in
this context it helps to think of them that way. Using the voltage rails to drive the output transistors still doesn't look 'right' at first until I think of the chips as a transistor with emitter and collector--with differential bases! Then the pieces of the puzzle fall into place and I can start to see the picture. I was going to object to the idea that the chips themselves were plenty powerful, but with the nested feedback that concept jumps ahead and looks much more interesting! This might be worth that headache after all. Arigato, sensei; this slow student may be learning to think, however slowly. Next question: does that 'transistor' actually behave something like a discrete transistor? There may be surprises lurking within. The "collector" and "emitter" might be very symmetrical in behavior, unlike a discrete transistor (we hope so!), but are they really linear? I suspect this is a case where a CCS would be inappropriate. This is all the time I have to puzzle over it; have to go fix supper! |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
sort of idealized transistor, but you surmise correctly about the potential for surprises. The is in the details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Go.to.bed:
The 3a hardly looks SuperSymmetric. I would try X-shape feedbacks from the outputs to the + nodes of the chips. Euro2004 adds my lack of .
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Variazioni.Goldberg:
Here is the correction |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
jh6you, that's much better. At least it looks way better
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
I never thought Mr. Pass would ever use an op-amp.
Well... times they are a'changin' I guess...
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
|
Quote:
in this case the SuSy is implemented already by the single resistor between the opamps outputs. Uli
__________________
![]() 'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Uli.Buli:
What about this? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
|
Hi,
I do not know yet, have to think it over The magic resistor between the OPAs outputs feeds error current into the output of the other OPA thus causing this amp to feed reverse current into this resistor. This error current is drawn from the supply. This in turn leads to creating this error current out of phase at the output -> SuSy. Your pic is indeed food for thought Uli
__________________
![]() 'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GC SuperSymmetry | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 797 | 13th July 2011 06:54 PM |
| GC SuperSymmetry pt V | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 8 | 29th June 2004 08:26 PM |
| GC SuperSymmetry pt II | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 22 | 27th June 2004 08:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10283 seconds (78.49% PHP - 21.51% MySQL) with 11 queries |