|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Oh, yeah, I should mention that I have no clue what-so-ever as to why bipolars are used for the differentail pair, with the exception that maybe we are supposed to be looking at current feedback, which I tried to employ.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
|
Metalman,
the 100 ohm load on the diff seems a tad low, no? |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
I did that to get unity gain off the the differential pair for a 1K base resistor. I was running with the assumption of a 1V input and unity gain so that R1 and R2 only needed to drop 1V from the +rail to avoid clipping. That and I was trying to keep things to nice simple round numbers as a starting point.
Feel free to point out obvious errors, as I am a metallurgical engineer fascinated with an audio hobby trying to do electrical design, learning via the trial-by-fire method. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
OK, the stupid-alarm just kicked in, and I realize that my configuration leaves the base of the bipolars at a high voltage whereas I need to have them somewhere near ground potential. I'll have a rethink of this and try to post something better later.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
|
Metalman,
I am just asking a serious question here OK? My questions are quick because I am work and constantly looking over my shoulders. I am not an EE either. (though I know alot more than just electronics |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Transylvania
|
Quote:
And don't come at me with power wasting is not that bad. It is bad for the very fact alone that it proves an extremely inefficient design. BTW, your sh|t talking has anything to do with your avatar or your underpaid situation? Because is is strange, underpaid but happy to pay for class A energy bills? |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
The one and only
|
Metalman, I see that you anticipate me.
The first schematic is now available in pdf at www.passlabs.com/np/GC-SS-1a.pdf This was intended to get some response while giving the geniuses a chance to start filling in their own values. Last night I filled in the values that I would start with - keep in mind that none of this has been tested. This is found in www.passlabs.com/np/GC-SS-1b.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
|
Sorry Roibm, I guess you didn't get my metaphor...
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
|
Thanks Nelson, this circuit should make everybody happy from the diehard gaincloner to the X aficionados.
It's got 2 Zobels, too! |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Quote:
-- Brian |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GC SuperSymmetry pt V | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 8 | 29th June 2004 08:26 PM |
| GC SuperSymmetry pt II | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 22 | 27th June 2004 08:01 AM |
| GC SuperSymmetry pt III | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 10 | 25th June 2004 08:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10768 seconds (77.25% PHP - 22.75% MySQL) with 11 queries |