|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
I just got the hifizen Aleph-X PCBs and I have two questions. Does the Aleph-X have enough gain to be driven directly by a CD player or DAC, without a preamp? And, is it possible to use a passive volume control, say just put a 10K attenuator at input?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Depends on your player, but very likely yes.
Yes, but it wouldn't hurt to go for a little higher resistance on the pot. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was using my Aleph X driven directly from a DAC. I had 500ohm switching attenuator at DAC's output. With 92dB speakers, I never run out of gain, but I was using 200k feedback resistor (instead of usual 100k).
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
My DAC won't drive 500 ohms properly as I can't fit larger DC blocking caps in the enclosure.
GRollins says to use over 10K. You are using lower. I'm confused. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
By one of them or both............
One would need to know if your driving your Aleph X single ended and what the feedback resistor values are. You need to know the output level for the CD player. I believe its usually a couple volts RMS. The efficency of your speakers is a big factor and an Aleph X with 15 or 20 volt rails is going to require a pretty efficient speaker. A passive volume control is not the best idea since the Amps feedback will not be symetrical. The series resistance from the output of the pot is part of the feedback resistor for a 10K pot the maximum resistance will be 2.5K which which gives a 12.5K resistance for the input feedback resistor for one side of the amp 10K for the other side if the input resistor is grounded for running the amp single ended. Using a larger pot will make this imbalance even worse and I haven't a clue why Mr. Rollins would reccomend it. Ask him, maybe there is a reason I don't know about. Knowing the gain for the amp you are using now would be useful since the Aleph X doesn't have a large amount of gain and maybe considerable less than many amps. With the feedback resistor values Mr. Rollins can tell you what the gain is running the amp with the input single ended. I believe he was disscussing this mode of operation with some one the other day and has more experience with this amp than I do. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
I'll be driving it balanced. The balanced output of the DAC is 1.8V. I plan to build the Aleph-X for about 100W/channel, but I have not started building yet so no value is fixed. I was hoping for a balanced input impedance of not much less than 10K.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
|
Look Prune, give it a shot with passive se drive use whatever pot you got 10k, 20k. At the most you won't achieve sonic bliss.
I don't remember exactly but the input sensitivity of the AX in its "regular" version (15V rails 5 amps bias one pair of 044 per side) was in the ball park of 2V RMS and the voltage gain is about 20 dB for 8 ohms so plenty of juice to run your speakers. The input imp. is no less than 10K |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
"driving it balanced"
Ganged pots......... or what? Give the poor guy some specific advice. So much for super symmetry......... I guess it would be sorta sorry semi symmetry You sound like you know who with this post. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
I will drive it balanced. I don't understand why using a balanced volume control would destroy the symmetry.
To rephrase my question, I want to find out what value balanced pot/attenuator would be best (while trying not to have a too low value as I can't drive it). |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
Get a dual ganged linear 100K or 50K. The 10K input impedance will give you law faking sort off log pot when connected to the wiper of the pot for its output. Passive preamps reqiuire short low capacitance interconnects and really don't have the dynamics of a buffered pot.
"I don't understand why using a balanced volume control would destroy the symmetry." It won't ......... my post was about driving it single ended which what Grataku was recommending and I thought you were doing originally. You have to give enough information to get a useful answer.......... Maybe Grey is the one to help you. He will probably look at your post tommorow. I think I am just confusing you. BTW I see you're Canadian. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aleph P volume | febytam | Pass Labs | 3 | 10th February 2007 06:08 AM |
| volume and aleph 1.7 | Kongen | Pass Labs | 2 | 9th April 2006 12:45 AM |
| Aleph P1.7 volume control | supernet | Pass Labs | 3 | 23rd September 2004 06:30 PM |
| Aleph P1.7 Volume Control | jleaman | Pass Labs | 7 | 18th September 2002 02:13 PM |
| Aleph L volume control | diy student | Pass Labs | 2 | 31st August 2001 06:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10337 seconds (78.89% PHP - 21.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |