Official M2 schematic

It is expected that the offset keeps moving a little bit around. If you blow on the MOSFETs it will vary more, but then come back to where you had set it.
Once you start tonight's listening session don't be too surprised when you realize it is already 2:00 AM and you did not see the time go by.

:D
 
It just occured to me that vishay may have merged both IR and Silconix parts under the same irfp part number.
Anyone know if this is true?
Either way, no one ever talks about siliconix, have they ever been tested by anyone here?

Yes by Mr Pass in article about mosfets testing.
Page text and graph show by courtesy of First Watt
http://www.firstwatt.com/pdf/art_mos_test.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 03081A61-015A-44F0-9C47-F751EA709B63.jpg
    03081A61-015A-44F0-9C47-F751EA709B63.jpg
    320.3 KB · Views: 529
  • 564CEA24-83DC-4114-9F28-3A9D5FE48078.JPG
    564CEA24-83DC-4114-9F28-3A9D5FE48078.JPG
    370.3 KB · Views: 521
  • B5D1650E-EE93-4502-A04B-0241EE0EED52.JPG
    B5D1650E-EE93-4502-A04B-0241EE0EED52.JPG
    64.6 KB · Views: 530
Those parts Nelson is referring to in that article are not Siliconix parts.
They are the original International Rectifier parts.

What I am wondering is if there are differences between Siliconix and IR.
Vishay now own both product lines.

To be specific, I wondering if there are differences between Sihfp9240 and irfp9240
 
Last edited:
Those parts Nelson is referring to in that article are not Siliconix parts.
They are the original International Rectifier parts.

What I am wondering is if there are differences between Siliconix and IR.
Vishay now own both product lines.

To be specific, I wondering if there are differences between Sihfp9240 and irfp9240

Yes, they have not original IR package logo, but inside is the same.
IR = Vishay= Siliconix
Vishay - Company Info - Vishay History
the stuff we find at Mouser for example are IRFP9240PBF and is RoHS compatible now.
This new Pb free version don't mean is not the same old IR semiconductor technology line product inside.
Vishay is packaging and this Guy's doesn't invest any money to make them perfect for audio
because this applications is not the big market place purpose.
Equivalent transistors can do the job and Rochester 8K pcs of Harris wait for Diyers.
Could we find some IXYS brand pairs maybe for M2 ?
 

Attachments

  • 8318146A-61EA-4554-8B39-4CE5ECF53114.JPG
    8318146A-61EA-4554-8B39-4CE5ECF53114.JPG
    267.7 KB · Views: 514
  • ADC796C0-6450-4A82-96B4-7E0165ECAB1B.JPG
    ADC796C0-6450-4A82-96B4-7E0165ECAB1B.JPG
    647.1 KB · Views: 513
Could we find some IXYS brand pairs maybe for M2 ?

I like IXTQ36N30P and IXTQ36P15P, which seem a pretty good match to me. Kind of like two IRFP240/IRFP9240 glued together in one package, but with higher transconductance and a better junction-case thermal resistance.

Haven't tried them in an M2, though they are currently serving nicely as source followers in another of my amps.
 
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
anyone tested M2 using this metal can?

Yes, and I have a few thousand of them. Same chip as the plastic.

That character of P channel types was an IR phenomenon - Harris and
Samsung and a couple others do not exhibit the transconductance shelf.

I seem to recall that at one point Samsung parts were acquired by IR,
so there were examples of IR parts that didn't have it.

The IR parts work, but you can measure a difference, which shows up as
an alteration in the distortion character between lower and higher
frequencies. Not a big deal, more of an issue for no-feedback amplifiers
and Common Source use.

Last time I tested Vishay IR's, the parts behaved the same as earlier.