Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th December 2013, 09:23 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
Default Class A Bias

Hi everybody,

If with a bridge topology at +4A per rail per side at +/- 42V DC Rail is given, the total power dissipation is about 672W.
Let's say it is roughly a little over 400W peak Class A power.
Given a 220mF capacitor bank on each rail, how can I correlate the idle power dissipation at the primary with the power dissipation of the secondary, keeping in consideration that the charging current for the reservoir bank brings brings peak current of 46A at the secondary after rectifier thus peak current of over +/- 22A at the primary (this will significantly increase the RMS current thus power consumption) ?
That would suggest that an amp with less capacitance will idle less power for a same given amount of Class A bias(?!?)
Is this statement true?
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 09:54 PM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi, I'm pretty sure its not true in any significant sense, rgds, sreten.

I can't follow the argument to arrive at the suggested conclusion.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:15 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
i cant see it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:23 PM   #4
Zen Mod is offline Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
surprised ?
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb ; Papatreasure
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:34 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
Hi, I'm pretty sure its not true in any significant sense, rgds, sreten.

I can't follow the argument to arrive at the suggested conclusion.
The argument is that if for a given amount of bias you have more capacitance, your peak current to charge this capacitance will be much higher than if you had less capacitance, which will reflect in an higher RMS current at the primary which ultimately translates into a huge amount if idle power.

The XA200.5 consumes roughly 700W idle but yet has 100mF per rail and 3.6A bias, which seems to be a pretty low figure compare to what I measure on my amp.
Maybe going from 100mF to 200mF causes the consumption to go from 700W to 1.2KW.
But then looking at the specs for the XS300 series which boosts twice as much capacitance as the XA, power consumption is still roughly 3 times the power rated power.
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:34 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Mod View Post
surprised ?
Yes and no. I just don't understand how the XA200.5 can idle only 700W
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:39 PM   #7
Zen Mod is offline Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
I'm not surprised
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb ; Papatreasure
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 10:57 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Mod View Post
I'm not surprised
Ok then would you mind explain why the 200.5 seems to idle less than what I would expect fo and get from the same bias setting?
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 11:00 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
here is a Peace of ohms Law. its called voltage
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2013, 11:02 PM   #10
Zen Mod is offline Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
nope

I already was idiot few times , trying to help you

now , I like more to be idiot for my own causes

__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb ; Papatreasure
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class B auto bias mchambin Solid State 6 1st March 2012 05:59 PM
High bias class D sendler Class D 42 18th September 2010 12:41 PM
How to bias mosfet in Class-A Anchan Solid State 18 7th August 2010 10:39 AM
Class A speakers, as in BIAS Pan Multi-Way 3 10th February 2005 01:28 AM
Class G Bias Questions Randy Knutson Solid State 7 18th December 2004 02:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Đ1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2