Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th April 2012, 12:13 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
Dan,
you are either a wimp or your temperature measurement is wrong.

If you feel it burning in under 5seconds, then I suspect you are over 50°C

Tc is likely to be about 10 to 15C degrees above the sink interface temperature, the hottest part that you cannot get into.
I have no reason to believe that the tool I was using wasn't relatively accurate.

Regards,
Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 12:17 PM   #12
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I see two reasons
1.) you could hold on for 5seconds.
2.) another Member told you the temp measurement system needs calibrating.

I'll gave you a third reason.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 12:35 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
KatieandDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
The original Pass amps run at about 78 Degrees I seem to recall.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:04 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Quote:
Instantly measure temperatures from a distance without contact. Ideal tool for measuring temperatures in hard to reach or dangerous to access places.


Temperature Range -40° to 380°C (-40° to 716°F)
Accuracy ±2°C or ±2%
Distance To Measurement Spot Ratio 8:1
Response Time 500 mSec
Laser Specifications Laser wave length: 650nm, 2-5 mw
Unit of Measurement Celcius or Fahrenheit
Display Easy to read large LCD display with blue backlight
Battery Details 9V alkaline or NiCd battery
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:08 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatieandDad View Post
about 78 Degrees I seem to recall.
Look Ma, it's a boy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pass_Willie.jpg (20.5 KB, 284 views)
__________________
Not so much,.......if it says "ZM" in the corner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:22 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: São Paulo
What's better, more small ribs with less space between them, or less big ribs with more space in between?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:25 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
KatieandDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Heatsink design is a balance of factors. However, they are all trying to achieve maximum surface area with enough space for the air to flow, using the least amount of material.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:45 PM   #18
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
wider gaps >=8mm suit passive airflow.
narrower gaps <=5mm suit actively blown airflow.

A flat plate rib will dissipate a certain quantity of heat.
A thin plate will run cooler at the tip.
A thick plate will run hotter at the tip.
A tapered plate will dissipate more heat relative to it's total weight than either of the parallel faced plates.

Similarly a thick backplate will be hotter further away from the emitting device than a thinner backplate.
For optimum use of material a tapered backplate would be better.
But most heatsinks are specified with the whole backplate face at an isothermal temperature at a fixed differential above ambient temperature. This specification does not show tapering of big backplate heatsinks in a comparatively good light. Some heatsinks use tapering and thermal travel distance to great effect to reduce the heatsink mass (and cost) relative to the dissipation capability.

Last edited by AndrewT; 12th April 2012 at 01:54 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2012, 01:34 AM   #19
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantwomey View Post
I have no reason to believe that the tool I was using wasn't relatively accurate.
True, but I have noticed that I get different readings depending on the
surface and the distance. Dull black surface at 1 cm is my standard.

  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2012, 02:50 AM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson Pass View Post
True, but I have noticed that I get different readings depending on the
surface and the distance. Dull black surface at 1 cm is my standard.

If my F5 smokes I'll ask about the warranty.

Regards,
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1M-F5 - A 1 MHz F5 project triode_al Pass Labs 43 25th October 2012 08:28 AM
F5 Cascoded - an alternative for my interest in the Balanced F5 NYCOne Pass Labs 159 24th March 2011 05:23 AM
F2 running hot(how hot is hot?) Aron Pass Labs 10 13th February 2009 03:42 PM
Hot hot ouch - rectifier Nordic Parts 9 8th October 2005 07:00 PM
Wave av-8 hot hot ?? adharvey Tubes / Valves 13 7th October 2003 07:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio