|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#591 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
|
Thanks AndrewT.
So, for 40 Vpk loaded, we need 45 Vpk unloaded, or a theoretical 45/1.414 = 31.82, or about 32 VAC for 100 watts RMS into 8R0 when biasing at around 2.6 amps. Using 1.3 instead of 1.414 as the rectification constant, gives us a 35 VAC transformer. If the rule of thumb for PS droop is about 2 volts/amp/pair of transistors, then for a large number of output transistors, say 4 pairs, each biased at 1 amp, we should get an 8 Volt droop or so. That means to get 40 Vpk from 4 pairs becomes 48 Vpk, which needs a theoretical 48/1.414= 34 VAC transformer. Using 1.3, gives a 37 VAC transformer. A 36 VAC transformer ought to be close to the the right size for a 100 watt amp using 4 pairs of outputs biased at 1 amp. Higher bias means more droop, so if the 4 pairs are biased at 1.3 amps, the droop will be closer to 10 volts, which will need 50 Vpk, or between a 36 and 38.5 VAC transformer. That makes a 38 VAC transformer the better choice. That is much more clear. thank you! Thanks! The interesting thing about this is that you can use a lower voltage transformer with fewer pairs, but still acheive the 100 watts output. I'm guessing that fewer pairs means more clarity, while more pairs means higher damping factor and better longevity. Last edited by BigE; 4th December 2012 at 03:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#592 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
The losses should be lower as the number of output pairs is increased. Select your idle output bias as 2.6A. That allows for 5Apk of ClassA output into 8r0. A single pair would need to be biased to 2.6A. The losses will be the sum of the cable resistance losses + the trace losses + the emitter resistor losses + the return cable losses. While still in ClassA the PSU will suffer virtually no droop from the fully biased voltage. A dual pair would have each pair biased to 1.3A. The losses through each pair carrying the half current halved. Those wires carrying the full 5Apk would not be any different from the single pair case. A 3pair would have each pair biased to 867mA. The losses are divided by 3 A 4pair etc..... A 6pair etc..... yet another unhelpful post? |
|
|
|
|
|
#593 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Trondheim
|
just started my F5 turbo V3 build. the PCB's i'm using is toecutter's prototype V3 boards. wich i cut in half(output boards that is) to get the heat spread well over my 2x10.080" profiles.
got the PSU layout ready to night. 1000VA 2x40V transformer 2x35A rectifier bridges(on there own sink). and 4x68.000uF caps. softstart will be modified hypex. this is ofcourse monoblocks
__________________
aleph P1.7 pre. F5 power amp. CDpro2(need DAC). Vivaldi8 speakers Last edited by AudioSan; 4th December 2012 at 06:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#594 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
Since the losses are related to the bias current, lower bias => lower losses, in my example, as the bias was not decreased as extra pairs were added, there was a lot of added droop. But, since the bias goes down with more pairs, as do the losses, then the size of the power transformer will also go down as pairs are added. Are we suggesting that as the voltage droop is a MAX of 5 volts or so, then the actual droop = 5* 1/number_of_pairs? eg, With two pairs the droop is halved, three it is a third, 4 it is a quarter? ie, with 4 pairs, the droop is not 5 volts, but only 1.25? That would mean that a 4 pair amp putting out 100 watts rms into 8R0 would need to make only 41.25 Vpk to cover the looses, which gives about a 32 VAC transformer. (Using 1.3 as the rectification constant.) With 36 VAC * 1.3 = 46.8 Vpk, or about 45.55 Vrail after losses for 4 pairs yields close to 130 watts RMS Class A power, biased at just 0.65ma. Do I have it right now? The more pairs, the less losses, the more output power. I hope this is not like banging your head against a wall -- I'm trying to learn that rule to select the right transformer, without someone just saying use XX vac... Thanks for helping. |
|
|
|
|
|
#595 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Trondheim
|
the bias don't go down with more pairs. just the bias pr output device.
__________________
aleph P1.7 pre. F5 power amp. CDpro2(need DAC). Vivaldi8 speakers |
|
|
|
|
#596 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
|
I see, the total bias stays the same, but the bias/device changes. So the droop is constant regardless of how many pairs.
|
|
|
|
|
#597 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Trondheim
|
yes
the transformer can influence the drop doh.
__________________
aleph P1.7 pre. F5 power amp. CDpro2(need DAC). Vivaldi8 speakers |
|
|
|
|
#598 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
|
Hmm so this means to get the final 50Vpk loaded, I will need about 55Vpk unloaded
which means 55V = 1.3 x 42Vsec from the transformer. This will mean that : 50Vpk /1.414 =35.36V and solve P=V^2 /R(8ohm) I should get 156Watts?! |
|
|
|
|
#599 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Trondheim
|
or make it alot easyer. 35VAC sec= about 45VDC wich give you aboyt 40Vpk-pk sving
and hoooome ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuun![]() ![]()
__________________
aleph P1.7 pre. F5 power amp. CDpro2(need DAC). Vivaldi8 speakers |
|
|
|
|
#600 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I hope you boys have some nice BIG heatsinks...or willing to cook on your amp
![]() Gotta love DIY.
__________________
|F6 Kit/Trasnformer GB Sign up sheet Closed,|Primrose GB Sign Up sheetClick Here ...Shape the sound , Man! |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F5 Turbo Circuit Boards | chchyong89 | Pass Labs | 2117 | Today 07:34 AM |
| F5 Turbo is posted | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 589 | 1st March 2013 01:19 AM |
| B1 builders thread | Bas Horneman | Pass Labs | 688 | 27th February 2013 11:15 AM |
| F5 turbo problems | Rob Dingen | Pass Labs | 17 | 11th January 2013 08:38 PM |
| F5 Turbo ............. if only !!!!!! | a.wayne | Pass Labs | 23 | 21st January 2012 02:24 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |