F5 Turbo Builders Thread

Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
balancing act between drive , increasing xconductance of OS and it's rising capacitance

as Papa recently said - I just hook these things up and see what I get

:rofl:

in his case "see" is certainly longish process

go figure

:clown:

for instance - in Babelfish J , I'm finding one pair of IRFP150N better than 2 pairs of IRFP240N ....... not just because matching is not necessary
 
Last edited:
Love the diode heatsinks...perfect for my solution.

Size of your main heatsink is ?

Looking forward to your findings driving that board really hard.:)

These sinks are 6" x 16". THey will not be the final destination. I will have another set that are 8" x 15" for the final build. I will use larger heat spreader as well, increasing 3/8" x 4 x 12" to 1/2" x 6 x 12"
 
Spreading audio porn all over tonight
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0097.JPG
    DSC_0097.JPG
    687.8 KB · Views: 774
Member
Joined 2006
Paid Member
These sinks are 6" x 16". THey will not be the final destination. I will have another set that are 8" x 15" for the final build. I will use larger heat spreader as well, increasing 3/8" x 4 x 12" to 1/2" x 6 x 12"

here's mine...shorter box ( 300 mm ) but 11 cm of heatsink depth by 15 cm high

should make a really nice and compact build :)
 

Attachments

  • heatsink.jpg
    heatsink.jpg
    104.7 KB · Views: 723
If i go with 4 pairs, I will use a single 1R resistor and cut the bias in half. I don't need more power, so it is just a matter of whether or not I like 4pairs@400mA or 2pairs@800mA. IF I like the 4 pair, I may try 4 at higher bias as well, using monoblocks. The heatsinks are very similar to the HS USA 10", but not the same. I have the HS 10" waiting in the wings. BTW, I should be packing the kit stuff in the next week or so. Also. I should be listening to a standard vs upgraded version of the F5T tonight. Little comparison.
 
Member
Joined 2006
Paid Member
:D:D
I know , the subjectivity i refer to is the comparison between a cooler running class a amp and a hotter ( better sounding ? ) one as has been expressed in many post.

I'm guessing a 4 pair one should have a cleaner punchier bass...i might be wrong :scratch:

My subjective reasoning is that current delivery to load should be quicker with 4 pair but that has to be possible also by the PSU.


????? let us know:D
 
Last edited:
If i go with 4 pairs, I will use a single 1R resistor and cut the bias in half. I don't need more power, so it is just a matter of whether or not I like 4pairs@400mA or 2pairs@800mA. IF I like the 4 pair, I may try 4 at higher bias as well, using monoblocks. The heatsinks are very similar to the HS USA 10", but not the same. I have the HS 10" waiting in the wings. BTW, I should be packing the kit stuff in the next week or so. Also. I should be listening to a standard vs upgraded version of the F5T tonight. Little comparison.

Yes, welcome ....... :) 8cylinders beat 4 cylinders ... for smoothness and delivery all the time ............. :drink:


I hope to measure the current two pair version this weekend and then do that as well for the 4 pair version. Too much subjectivity is trouble around here.

Pour it on , I gotcha back bro ..... :D
 
hello. just got a great idè regarding P3 trimmer for this amp, and all other F5's for hat matter.
how about a multi turn panel mount pot, connected to a digital ohm meter with a smal display on the front? that way you can easely get 2 monoblocks adjusted the same.
and for a stereo amp, one gan use a stereo pot with one ohm meter and display.
what do you think? and do anyone know who can be selling ohm meteres that can be used(that you can calibrate yourself)?