|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1641 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
|
No, but I had also autoformers in mind...
This is a good solution for higher voltage curves of 2sk82 but you wont get rid of the big elec. cap. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#1642 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I played again with the SK82 and a CCS version with a R100. The rival was a R085 instead of the SIT.
The gain with the R085 was ugly high, about 25-30x and you could already hear the hiss from the semi with my 86db Lowther. Sound was heavy and good, but not spectacular. The sound with SIT was much more detailed, but very thin. ZM advised me to seek for the reason not in the CCS, but in the lower part. First I thought that the different transconductance makes the difference. Around 5-6 Siemens against 0.5 Siemens. Or was it the big amplification difference hat fooled me.... Later I read Mikes article again, and stopped at the 'load line' term. Indeed I had a combination of voltage and current for the Sit that was not on the loaddline Mike showed. I chosed the 19V/1.6A point and I have the strong impression that the sound now lost the overly bright character. Am I fooled by my exspectations? Does anybody have similar experiences? Or is it simply the different combination of K2 and k3 that pleases me. What is the advantage or disadvantage to be on the loadline with the SIT? Is it possible that the importance of loadline is less important with the R085? Any answers welcome!
__________________
and the First W tt is......a really First Class P SS Idea !
|
|
|
|
#1643 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
I believe that the K82s need to be matched a bit, following the loadline in Mike's article.
I dont have a tracer for high voltage/current, but I can tell for sure that there is a lot of variance among the sony SITs. I have 4 units, two are decently close, but the other two are way off (at the extremes).
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
#1644 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
as i said - and 'twas not invented by mighty moi - THD spectra is explanation for everything
The Class-A Amplifier Site - Jean Hiraga Index , just few general remarks , but these will maybe lead you further there are more papers on French , but I will must wait to meet my fave Froggy Yoda for clarification ....
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
#1645 |
|
www.audiohobby.com
diyAudio Member
|
The R085 is more pentodey than a 2SK82 so there's less opportunity for working the loadline in OTL territory. Interestingly, the R085 (I posted some curves somewhere recently) is probably more well suited to an SET coupled design as it's more triodey at low-current high voltage. You probably couldn't go real high on the primary impedance, but a 64-150 Ohm transformer is probably workable, e.g. NP's Arch Nemesis.
You might also want to try a bit of degeneration with the R085, if the f-word doesn't bother you. For the second part of your question: with a SIT, working the loadline to get the harmonic flavor you like best is where all the fun is. In my experience when the second and third harmonics are about the same magnitude things start to sound more threadbare.
__________________
My Website, Projects, Sale Items |
|
|
|
#1646 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Here your traces again, annotated.
|
|
|
|
#1647 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
ACA upper part is interesting , as load
ya didn't hear that from moi ![]() btw. Mr. MR ....... where are you lately ....... Buzz iz having all the buzz for himself , without us
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
#1648 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
|
Quote:
I tend to prefer the 2nd bout 33% higher but you surely got more experience than I.
__________________
"The total harmonic distortion is not a measure of the degree of distastefulness to the listener and it is recommended that its use should be discontinued." D. Masa, 1938 |
|
|
|
|
#1649 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|F6 Kit/Trasnformer GB Sign up sheet Closed,|Primrose GB Sign Up sheetClick Here ...Shape the sound , Man! |
|
|
|
|
#1650 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
you're like squirrel , jumping all the time
I can't follow ya ....... so - from now - you must put a link to everything you mention wakoosquirrelyank
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; Mighty ZM's Bloggg;I'm dumb
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| L’Amp: A Simple SIT Amp: Part 1 | Michael Rothacher | diyAudio.com Articles | 20 | 2nd March 2013 08:26 PM |
| SIT Amp Article Out Now | Variac | Site Announcements | 0 | 2nd December 2011 07:55 AM |
| Srajan has the 1st SIT amp for Une dégustation | vizion | Pass Labs | 131 | 14th November 2011 11:41 PM |
| SIT-Preamp | VladimirK | Solid State | 36 | 27th August 2011 08:36 PM |
| New SIT - old problem | StevenOH | Parts | 2 | 13th June 2008 10:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |