|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dixon ill
|
in the solid state fourm, the question was presented about sound of bpt mosfets etc in class a.
it was pointed out again more current bias in a mosfet is good. made me wonder. what is the point of no b getting better. llike a dimmer switch you want it in the middle. so you can get brighter and dimmer.. to much bias and you wont get a full swing. so my question is......what is the best. if the fet is 10 amp should you aim for 5amps? or is there a sweet spot with each brand, type, of fet. if so what is that called? is it in the spec sheet? all of this is pretending heat etc dosent matter. hope im not being to ignorant. also please forgive spelling, i cant check using my phone. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: near the sea
|
Quote:
P= UI, so you have to be sure you don't break too much the SOA limit ( Safe Operating Area ). For current TO247 devices, Nelson states to get them running at about 30W max each. This is close to the limit chosen by the master himself for the Aleph_J, good example; the last of the Aleph series, with a double jfet as front end. I'm currently upgrading my Aleph_4 to get this jfet build running. If you look closer, intended bias is 1,15A per device, on 24V rails it means roughly 28W per device. Nelson used 2 output devices / 2 CCS power mosfets IRFP240, each device handling about 30W. After this limit, depending on heatsinking arrangement and thermal losses ( Mica / Sil Pads / Keratherm, torque applied to the Mosfets, thermal conductivity issues, etc) you can't be sure the inner temp of the device is cool enough. Too high temp reduces lifespan of your project. That said, the higher the bias, at the point your heatsinks can handle, often the better the sound is ![]() The sweep spot exists in all devices. Most of the time it is not predictable however, won't show up clearly in the datasheet, so you'll have to trial & error to find this particular point. Doing so, it is better to cross check measurements and sonic results. This is where mastering a design becomes difficult for most of us here ![]() Best, nAr
__________________
"... Audio needs the thinnest wire ..." Rowan McCombe "Just 'cause they can't hear or sense it themselves doesn't mean you can't !" Allen Wright Last edited by nar; 8th November 2011 at 07:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
just go to Pass and/or First Watt site , download all pdfs and read
Papa already gave more details and insights in subject , than we can write here in a month anyway - shortly from praxis here in Papaland : more bias is better dissipation per device in range of up to 25W ( usually ) to 50W ( for brave ones ) be sure that heatsinking is good/sufficient (interface between part and hsink also very imortant ) to keep things no hotter than 55C on hottest outer part of hsink edit : Nar was faster .... but I'm still dumbest around
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: near the sea
|
Quote:
Reason : adding some more lines ... ![]() Best, nAr
__________________
"... Audio needs the thinnest wire ..." Rowan McCombe "Just 'cause they can't hear or sense it themselves doesn't mean you can't !" Allen Wright |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dixon ill
|
zen nar thanks.
zen i have been slowly reading all of the stuff ive downloaded. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The one and only
|
I have not encountered a case where more bias did not improve Mosfet
performance, at least until the devices died...
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The one and only
|
We use them at PL. I use mica and grease on FW. The difference is that
PL uses tons of devices, and FW uses fewer and works them harder.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dixon ill
|
Quote:
now, if i could ask why? is it the heating up of the simiconductor stuff on the die or is it the extra current that it provides for the cir? or somthing else i havent thought of. for example 10 mosfets at .5A sound the same as 5 mosfets at 1A is it the indaviduual devices or total? thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The one and only
|
Fundamentally, the transconductance becomes higher with current and the
non-linearity of the transconductance becomes a lower percentage of signal current. The gain or damping factor gets higher and the distortion gets lower. Also, chicks dig it.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How To Adjust Bias Current? | Bushulo | Pass Labs | 1 | 14th July 2008 02:11 PM |
| a problem - no bias current | sunrise | Solid State | 49 | 25th April 2008 10:36 AM |
| bias voltage vs bias current | woodturner-fran | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 24th February 2007 11:24 PM |
| Bias current | peter5 | Solid State | 6 | 13th January 2004 04:39 PM |
| Hafler bias current | Fritz | Solid State | 11 | 31st December 2003 06:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09767 seconds (88.08% PHP - 11.92% MySQL) with 10 queries |