|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Burlington, NC
|
What are reasons for not using a cascoded topology whenever possible. It would seem to offer benefits in all circumstances with the exception of a minimalistic design. I think I remember Pass saying that some think it minimzes dynamics, is this true or just bias towards uber simplicity. I don't have a problem with simplicity, its just that cascoded designs offer so much in terms of controlling conditions that could improve an amp in terms of performance. Is this where the art of design comes into play.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
One of the disadvantages is that the cascode voltage eats into your supply voltage limiting output voltage swing of the stage. In a pre this may not be any big deal you just use a hiher voltage supply. In an output stage it is much more of a compromise with power dissapation and efficiency.
__________________
“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” Dr. Seuss |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Burlington, NC
|
Aren't there advantages to running higher voltages as well. In most of the Pass articles, increased voltage tended to yield better results, although I think examples were SE (DeLite,SOZ). Perhaps the higher voltages across the fets also help with capacitance and this is the reason for the improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
and since then I have seen examples going either way. As a concept, cascoding should increase dynamics, but it is not always perceived so by listeners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Burlington, NC
|
I had read the cascoded amp article, but thought I had read elsewhere where you made this same statement about a perception of lack of dynamics. Perception is a tricky thing. One last question Nelson, based on your DiyOpamp article, cascoding a differential pair seems to increase performance significantly, do you choose not to use this in your FW stuff for simplicity sake. I guess there is the chance that you have listened to and preferred the non cascaded version, or perhaps, these amps are an introduction to a topology and have not been developed completely in terms of performance. Is this where Pass Labs begins and on the building blocks of FW? Thanks for info so far.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The one and only
|
The decision to cascode the Jfets on some of the amps is sometimes made
based on voltage and dissipation limitations of the input devices. This is not a problem with the FW amplifiers. After that, the question is simply whether it measures or sounds better with cascoding. It almost always measures better, but sometimes the improvement is not worth the additional complexity, and often the sonics are a wash.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Burlington, NC
|
Thanks for the answer.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cascoded F5 | NYCOne | Swap Meet | 0 | 7th February 2011 06:50 AM |
| Cascoded ZV7 | Fuling | Pass Labs | 17 | 6th December 2006 03:26 PM |
| Leach Amp Clone/10 transisitors | marcony | Solid State | 1 | 31st July 2006 11:44 AM |
| Leach Amp Clone/10 transisitors | marcony | Class D | 1 | 13th July 2006 02:26 AM |
| H-Bridge using Bipolar Transisitors | andy_mcm | Class D | 2 | 24th March 2005 02:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10302 seconds (75.52% PHP - 24.48% MySQL) with 10 queries |