What are reasons for not using a cascoded topology whenever possible. It would seem to offer benefits in all circumstances with the exception of a minimalistic design. I think I remember Pass saying that some think it minimzes dynamics, is this true or just bias towards uber simplicity. I don't have a problem with simplicity, its just that cascoded designs offer so much in terms of controlling conditions that could improve an amp in terms of performance. Is this where the art of design comes into play.
Aren't there advantages to running higher voltages as well. In most of the Pass articles, increased voltage tended to yield better results, although I think examples were SE (DeLite,SOZ). Perhaps the higher voltages across the fets also help with capacitance and this is the reason for the improvement.
OTOH Nelson has a patent for an amp with everything (including the output devices) cascoded, which he claims improves dynamics. See here: http://www.passlabs.com/pdfs/articles/cascode.pdf
That is simply an article published in Audio, not a patent. It's an old article,
and since then I have seen examples going either way. As a concept,
cascoding should increase dynamics, but it is not always perceived so by
listeners.
I had read the cascoded amp article, but thought I had read elsewhere where you made this same statement about a perception of lack of dynamics. Perception is a tricky thing. One last question Nelson, based on your DiyOpamp article, cascoding a differential pair seems to increase performance significantly, do you choose not to use this in your FW stuff for simplicity sake. I guess there is the chance that you have listened to and preferred the non cascaded version, or perhaps, these amps are an introduction to a topology and have not been developed completely in terms of performance. Is this where Pass Labs begins and on the building blocks of FW? Thanks for info so far.
The decision to cascode the Jfets on some of the amps is sometimes made
based on voltage and dissipation limitations of the input devices. This is not
a problem with the FW amplifiers. After that, the question is simply whether
it measures or sounds better with cascoding. It almost always measures
better, but sometimes the improvement is not worth the additional
complexity, and often the sonics are a wash.
based on voltage and dissipation limitations of the input devices. This is not
a problem with the FW amplifiers. After that, the question is simply whether
it measures or sounds better with cascoding. It almost always measures
better, but sometimes the improvement is not worth the additional
complexity, and often the sonics are a wash.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.