|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bangalore
|
I have just completed making a PCB for my F5 PSU. The circuit I have used is an adaptation of NPs PSU schematic. Instead of CCRCC, I have used CRCCRCC. The values of C being 22000 uF and R being 0.47 ohms.
After soldering all the components, I realized that I have inserted Rs in the positive leg of the supply for both halves as against Papa using the R in the positive rail of the upper half and R in the negative Rail of the bottom half of the PSU. I want to know if the error committed in my PSU is going to be impacting the supply in any way? is the RC filter going to be effective? I am enclosing my schematic for reference. Please let me know. Thanks in advance. Cheers.
__________________
F5 clone, Aleph J clone, Fostex 206 BLH, Altec/Onken, Behringer Digital Xover, Technics SP10 MKII & SL-1210. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Ah yes, that bottom set is wrong, it is basicaly on the ground trace...
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
The short answer is yes.
Once you have moved the resistors, you will also need to break the 0V loop. If your caps have screw terminals, it may be easier to flip them and swap the input and output connections. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bangalore
|
IMHO there is no problem electrically with the circuit. It is just two independent DC power supplies wired for +22V, 0V, -22V configuration.
My doubt is if the RC filter is going to be effective only in one leg as a result of my mistake as compared to the original Papa's schematic.
__________________
F5 clone, Aleph J clone, Fostex 206 BLH, Altec/Onken, Behringer Digital Xover, Technics SP10 MKII & SL-1210. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
From an AC point of view, there is no difference if R is in the + or - rail. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bangalore
|
Quote:
That's my question. From a hum point of view, if the RC works, I am good. Otherwise, I was planning to cut the PCB tracks and hardwire the bottom rail again. Thanks.
__________________
F5 clone, Aleph J clone, Fostex 206 BLH, Altec/Onken, Behringer Digital Xover, Technics SP10 MKII & SL-1210. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Hi,
I think this would be good |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Sorry,
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bangalore
|
__________________
F5 clone, Aleph J clone, Fostex 206 BLH, Altec/Onken, Behringer Digital Xover, Technics SP10 MKII & SL-1210. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bangalore
|
Thanks for all the advice and help, the psu works unchanged. It does not matter if the RC network is in the negative leg or the positive leg since it is trying to suppress AC hum.
Cheers.
__________________
F5 clone, Aleph J clone, Fostex 206 BLH, Altec/Onken, Behringer Digital Xover, Technics SP10 MKII & SL-1210. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F5 PSU Fuse | drcg | Pass Labs | 0 | 18th April 2011 11:55 AM |
| FS: Cviller F5 P.C.B with PSU | bchristmas | Swap Meet | 1 | 11th September 2010 02:16 AM |
| FS : Peter DANIEL PCB F5 + PSU | korben69 | Swap Meet | 6 | 10th September 2010 12:47 PM |
| F5 psu layout | OliG | Power Supplies | 5 | 2nd April 2010 10:52 PM |
| Bpa300, f5, psu, lm4780 for sale | chatziva | Swap Meet | 16 | 5th October 2009 08:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09505 seconds (80.32% PHP - 19.68% MySQL) with 11 queries |