ISO: Current output amplifier schematics - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd April 2011, 11:42 AM   #1
rsdio is offline rsdio  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Default ISO: Current output amplifier schematics

There are a few articles mentioning the implications of current source amplifiers, as opposed to the prevalent voltage source amplifiers, but I have not seen any schematics. Funny thing is that I know how to rewire my speaker crossovers for a current source amplifier thanks to these fine articles, but I don't know how to build a current source amplifier. I'm not interested in the high power resistor method of converting a voltage source amplifier to behave like a current source amplifier even though that is interesting, but would prefer to learn about how to make an amplifier that is a current source.

I did try searching for this topic before posting, but mostly I find the well-known constant current source building block which improves the Class A voltage source amplifier by replacing the inefficient bias resistor. Actually, there are quite a few constant current source circuits around these parts, and they have more than one useful application in amplifiers. But that's not what I'm looking for.

A couple of articles looked promising. One asked whether the F4 is a current source amplifier, but the answer was no. Another asked about ZV8 and ZV9, but I don't see that they're current source amplifier circuits. Am I missing something?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:18 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
StevenOH's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
There are plenty of the published circuits that can be modified for Current
Drive. They already have high open loop output impedance, and only the overall FB need to be rearranged from Voltage fb to Current fb.
These candidates will have:
Load connected to (complementary) drains/collectors - like in the F5. The cfb will be taken not from the top end of the load, but from the bottom end, connected to the small (a few tenths of Ohm), but powerful resistor (current sensor) to the Gnd.
Output is taken from the source/emitter follower arrangement with added capacitor bootstrap from the output. This mod will transform your Follower (Common Drain) into Common Source configuration with naturally high output impedance. Very good example is here:
JLH 10 Watt class A amplifier Link, p.2, mosfet version
Again, you will have to remove Voltage fb to preserve high Zout.
Now, you may want to consider the need for the Current fb at all- after all, the Zout already will be sufficiently high, and the cfb will be reducing distortion. Maybe, just servo DC fb.
The truth is out there. Who can handle the truth?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:26 PM   #3
DougL is offline DougL  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wheaton IL.
Blog Entries: 31
I beleive you are looking for the F1 and F2.

Scienta sine ars nihil est - Science without Art is nothing. (Implies the converse as well)
Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 04:53 PM   #4
flg is offline flg  United States
diyAudio Member
flg's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North East
Actually I believe almost any FET common source amp without NFB will be essentially a "current amp" or Transconductance amp. Such as the initial versions of ZV8 and ZV9. Trouble is, we ussually need at least 6-12db FB.
If I follow what StevenOH says, I believe he is describing the typical circuit for a "current forcing" "VI" card of a test system, as many of us may know it. Although a DAC is outputing a level to the amplifier section, rather than a music source, just useing a small sense resistor in the output leg for the FB and it will do the job. It is important to think about Over Voltage Protection when working with such circuits as when conditions are not readily met with the FB or the load, it will swing to the rail trying.
"It was the perfect high end audio product: Exotic, inefficient, expensive, unavailable, and toxic." N.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 06:25 PM   #5
knutn is offline knutn  Norway
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo
As pointed out by StevenOH, you can take about any amplifier with feedback, rearrange it, and you have the amplifier you need, see this thread The Secret of Tube Amplifiers Revealed - and much more! the figure in post#1 has a sense resistor (0.4 - 0.5 ohms). For non-feedback amplifier, a traditional transconductance amplifier would be a nice choice, among these are the Pass' examples...
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 07:25 PM   #6
The one and only
Nelson Pass's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
It is my experience that while you can get benefits from
a higher output impedance than 0 from an amplifier,
almost nobody ends up wanting a very high value. Most
of the time somewhere less than 10 ohms is judged optimal,
and if that's the case, you would expect that a series resistor
of the appropriate value would do the job. A little power
wasted, but a cheap experiment nevertheless.

It's interesting that no one seems to do this. I've heard
comments like "It sucks the life out of the music".

Why this would be is a mystery.

  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2011, 10:50 PM   #7
rsdio is offline rsdio  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Thanks for the replies so far. I'm going to need to spend some time digesting the comments.

It makes sense that most transistor configurations are initially current output. The typical single stage inverting circuit just uses a resistor from the positive rail to convert a current being pulled to ground via the transistor into a voltage that is inversely proportional to the input. Remove the resistor and you're left with the current, but only in one direction with a single transistor.

Can you simply place the speaker between the positive rail and the transistor? That would seem bad, since there'd only be unipolar current, which is like a DC offset.

I suppose the other option is to run common drain and place the speaker between the source and ground, with a small resistor between the speaker and ground for current sensing feedback. Again, that's still unipolar current, but at least the speaker terminal voltages are near ground rather than near the positive rail.

It seems that the only way to have bipolar current is to run a push-pull transistor pair in current mode, or to somehow have a balanced single-ended output that has transistors on both speaker terminals - but I don't quite see how the latter could work. Also, running push-pull seems to be getting away from Zen ... does current output require a more complex circuit with more transistors, and thus is less Zen?

  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2011, 12:09 AM   #8
rsdio is offline rsdio  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Ok, I think one aspect of current source amplification seems clearer:

You can create a 'negative' voltage across speaker terminals via a pair of single-ended voltage output stages by having the (-) terminal at a higher potential than the (+) terminal. Thus, you do not strictly need a negative supply rail, nor do you need the typical push-pull transistor pair (although you still have a pair of transistors, at a minimum, because you need two output stages to operate in this balanced output mode).

It seems that you cannot create a 'negative' output current with single-ended transistor stages. So, if you want to design a current output amplifier, I have the impression that it must be based on a push-pull output circuit. If I'm missing something, please let me know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2011, 07:08 AM   #9
Calvin is offline Calvin  Germany
diyAudio Member
Calvin's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: close to Basel

Quote: would expect that a series resistor
of the appropriate value would do the job. A little power
wasted, but a cheap experiment nevertheless.

It's interesting that no one seems to do this. I've heard
comments like "It sucks the life out of the music".
Well isnīt it just that what a output transformer of a tube amp -and a few ancient solid state amps as well- does? Moving the output impedance towards power matching instead of voltage matching?

  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2011, 09:46 PM   #10
rsdio is offline rsdio  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Anyone want to take a stand, answering my question above?

Can a single-ended topology work as a current source?

(new question: Could the negative impedance of the Aleph current source be of any use in producing bidirectional current from a single-ended source?)
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High voltage, low current output stage for class D amplifier ionomolo Class D 45 15th February 2011 06:03 PM
DC on output of Chinese 'current mode' ebay amplifier ben12345 Solid State 20 28th May 2010 08:27 AM
Changing Output Resistors to Make Current Source Amplifier gni Solid State 2 9th October 2007 04:42 PM
Output Bias current for Zen-Like Amplifier wrenchone Pass Labs 9 15th August 2004 05:51 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Đ1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2