|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
How important, or rather, how unimportant, is the small amount of feedback on the F1? I am looking to build one, but I wanted to use input transformers rather than the input caps. In order for this to work, the gates of the two FETs must be at the same potential. This means biasing them from the same voltage, which means biasing from B+ (a resistor divider to set the bias point then connect to each gate via a 500K resistor) rather than their own drains, thus removing the feedback. I have done this on other designs (diferential followers) and it works fine, but I thought there might be something sneaky going on with the F1 that could lead to unanticipated issues. I'll still bias the tail CCS from the drains.
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
If you match the Fets, they will balance by themselves,
but probably you should allow for some ability to trim the values a bit. Since the F1 uses some small resistance on the Sources of the Fets, you can trim those values without touching the input balance.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 'Local Feedback and Nonlinearity of Multistage Feedback Amplifiers' | mikeks | Solid State | 62 | 20th July 2005 08:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07488 seconds (66.63% PHP - 33.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |