F5 For Low Z Loads ? - Page 18

flg · 02:20 AM

Thanks Papa, any new inovative ideas are welcome to this thread. I really thought there would be more interest but, I'm just another member, and think I they all want comments from the guy with his name on the forum catagory???

flg · 27th April 2012, 04:51 PM

Well, now that The "One and Only" has posted the F5 Turbo article, and some diggestion has taken place, we might think we were a little before our time???
Whatever,,, I don't think we are to different than the Version 1???
So, I've manipulated a few things in life and my head... I'm going to go ahead with most of what I have said previously, even after reading the article. I see where many have merged towards option 2 (Diodes in the Rs path). My opinion on that is mostly, How efficient are your speakers??? There is also a good point (based on your speaker eff.) to strive for classA. All the un-expected, out of phase current draw, resonance dips, etc. etc. difficulties can be dealt with in class AB, good enough, IMHO. But 95% or something, will be class A sound and the AB trasients will be tolerable.
The big difference seems to be, Version 1 strives to optimixze a higher voltage higher Z load system and we are trying to optimize a lower Z lower Violtage system

a.wayne · 27th April 2012, 06:58 PM

Build it and they will come ...

30th January 2012, 02:13 AM	#171
flg diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: North East	Thanks Papa, any new inovative ideas are welcome to this thread. I really thought there would be more interest but, I'm just another member, and think I they all want comments from the guy with his name on the forum catagory??? __________________ “Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” Dr. Seuss Last edited by flg; 30th January 2012 at 02:20 AM.

27th April 2012, 04:51 PM	#172
flg diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: North East	Well, now that The "One and Only" has posted the F5 Turbo article, and some diggestion has taken place, we might think we were a little before our time??? Whatever,,, I don't think we are to different than the Version 1??? So, I've manipulated a few things in life and my head... I'm going to go ahead with most of what I have said previously, even after reading the article. I see where many have merged towards option 2 (Diodes in the Rs path). My opinion on that is mostly, How efficient are your speakers??? There is also a good point (based on your speaker eff.) to strive for classA. All the un-expected, out of phase current draw, resonance dips, etc. etc. difficulties can be dealt with in class AB, good enough, IMHO. But 95% or something, will be class A sound and the AB trasients will be tolerable. The big difference seems to be, Version 1 strives to optimixze a higher voltage higher Z load system and we are trying to optimize a lower Z lower Violtage system __________________ “Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” Dr. Seuss

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Threshold S/500 stable at low loads?	RobertS61	Pass Labs	18	23rd November 2010 10:50 PM
LM3886 & low impeadence loads	vinodk	Chip Amps	6	21st May 2010 03:12 AM
Class D and Very Low Impedance loads	Bruno Putzeys	Class D	30	3rd August 2005 08:38 AM
Driving Low Impedance Loads	weinstro	Solid State	14	8th May 2005 09:53 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

27th April 2012, 06:58 PM	#173
a.wayne diyAudio Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Front Row Center	Build it and they will come ...