Let me fan the flames--Driverack and F5 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th December 2010, 02:08 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, FL
Smile Let me fan the flames--Driverack and F5


Pondering this one in my mind, for several weeks.

Granted, the F5 design is sheer elegance, simplicity, and a "best application" of the less-is-more approach to audiophilodom. (I think that is a new word.)

On the other hand, the Driverack series of digital audio processing is everything but simple and uncomplicated. (From my perspective.)

So, everyone--your thoughts about using a complex digital processor (like the Driverack 260) in a home system with F5 amps? Does the use of the Driverack violate the basic tenets of a "purist system", or does the Driverack provide such ability to tune a home system (two-channel, tri-amp'ed) that it would be an advantage?

Let the debate begin, I guess. Seriously looking for some good thoughts on this one.....

  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 03:37 AM   #2
The one and only
Nelson Pass's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
I have not used the Driverack, so I don't have a basis for an
opinion. I tend to lean toward analog solutions for many
functions, but if there is any lesson I have learned in 40 years
it's that you would be foolish not to give it a listen and see
what you get.

  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 03:43 AM   #3
6L6 is offline 6L6  United States
diyAudio Moderator
6L6's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Many moons ago there was an article in Sound Practices where some guy was using a pro-audio Xover/EQ to get a high-efficency horn system to work with low- and flea- powered single ended tube amps.

He said it did everything he needed and sounded awesome!!

As Papa says, give it a try. I bet it will work well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 04:27 AM   #4
sangram is offline sangram  India
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
There's dbx, which is pricey but much better in almost every way than the Behringers and the Driverack (cheaper than a commercial F5, though).

Where I last worked we ran the top half of an Emerald Physics CS2.7 with a Symphonic Line RG-10 Reference, a pretty accomplished amplifier. The chain also had a (modded) Behringer DCX2496 and it was pretty much the best system I heard all year. The bottom was driven by a cheap little Odyssey Khartago. The drivers are ~96dB efficient so a few watts is all it needed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 06:24 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
vdi_nenna's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PA, USA
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via Yahoo to vdi_nenna
[it] violate the basic tenets of a "purist system", or does the Driverack provide such ability to tune a home system (two-channel, tri-amp'ed)
Good question. I was thinking the same thing. Have two F5s, a BOZ-J and working on open-baffles. Kind of simple, right? Was looking to throwing in a miniDSP, but does that ball-up the works? It's right in the middle of 2 perfectly good analog amps.

CD used to be marked AAD and DDD. DDD for all digital. At some point there had to have been a analog stage in there. I felt that DDD CD sounded a bit better.

I'm almost finished the MOX and I might still get a miniDSP. Will let you know what I find.

I build, therefore I am.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 07:41 PM   #6
imix500 is offline imix500  United States
diyAudio Member
imix500's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
My experience with the lower-end Driveracks is that they are not the quietest dsp out there. They are also built for the weekend warrior type pa owner and are not very flexible past the factory presets. Once you hit the 480 everything gets better. You also pay a lot more. I don't think there is much advantage over the behringer other than the brand name.
I would look at Xilica or a used XTA or BSS omnidrive.
Another aspect of the pro dsp's you may not be aware of is gain structure. Many meter at dBFs instead of the analog dBu type meter. 0dBFs is equal to something like +18 or +24 dBu in these units. This means you might have to adjust the gain structure of your system if you intend to "use all the bits". Personally, I believe it was important to do so in a 16bit world, but less so in the 24bit world we are in now.

Last edited by imix500; 29th December 2010 at 07:56 PM. Reason: Clarity
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 08:25 AM   #7
Jen-B is offline Jen-B  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Originally Posted by CanAm Man View Post
Does the use of the Driverack violate the basic tenets of a "purist system"...

I know nothing about the Driverack, however when it comes to the design philosophy... why would you want to defeat yourself for the sake of owning a "purist system"?

Surely a wise person will set out with a goal and then do whatever is necessary to reach that goal? If a system works better by being more complex, then accept its complication.

It makes me smile when folks simplify to the point of poor performance just so they can mentally identify with a given philosophical position!

I am not personally in favour of 'more complex' or 'more simple'; but instead I think it best to focus on performance not design philosophy... and have as many parts as required to do the right job right.

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dbx DriveRack PA F/S nvrgdenuf Swap Meet 1 17th May 2009 03:57 PM
dbx driverack 260 mods slr 5000 Digital Source 0 16th July 2008 02:09 AM
I'm going down in flames amc32 Car Audio 13 11th July 2008 04:18 PM
DBX driverack pa as a x-over for ML M-III's ted betley Planars & Exotics 0 18th May 2007 01:20 PM
DBX Driverack PA vs. Behringer DCX2496 ? Steve M Digital Line Level 18 16th December 2005 02:14 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2