|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am on the process of gartering parts to build one or 2 of Nelson designs
Reading trough the various posts there is quite a bit of information relating to moss fet matching and testing. Patrick and others are doing quite a bit of work on this especially on finding less noisy Jfets Papa Nelson wrote a couple of articles on this regard. How to: Matching Devices Passdiy Piratical Mos fet Testing for Audio First watt I have started to test a batch of 10 IRFP240 and this is what I am finding out. Test conditions I feed 10 volts to a 10 Hom's resistor to the drain of the Moss fet The gate is connected trough a resistor and a pot to the + 10V The source connected to the ground. I have a block of mild steal 25 X 50 X 100 mm a thermometer of which the tip sit under the center Mos fet trough a hole drilled at a couple of millimeters on one corner of the Iron Block. The Moss fet is clamped to the iron block. Now I keep the Moss fet under a lamp just to get them settled at a bit over ambient temperature I was running the test for about 4 to 5 minutes and then take a reading of the VGS I have noticed that the same Mos fet was giving different results depending on the temperature. If I run the test for longer say 10 15 minutes the temperature appears to level out at about 31C I must have reached an equilibrium between the heat given out by the Moss fet and the heat dissipated by the iron block. If I retest the same Moss fet at the same temperature the results are the same. Ergo: Mossfet matching need Constant voltagge and constant temperature. I suspect that if I make the Iron block smaller I may be able to Shorten the test time but the temperature at which it will settle will be higher. At he momement I am taking the reading with a 4000 count multimiter and should be able to match at the second decimal place. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
RIP
|
You can use a 100 ohm resistor and 15V and eliminate the iron block altogether. Once you power up wrap a towel around the fet to eliminate any breezes. It will still take several minutes for them to settle. You can preheat them to 98* with your fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
so what are you measuring? do you increase the pot until the drain voltage is 5V and then measure VGS, or how are you doing it?
IMHO you should try to bias the part at an operating point close to where it will be in your amplifier, and chose a suitable parameter for matching the devices (e.g. VGS at that operating point). This will be more precise but time-consuming. Fortunately, the dependance of VGSTH on chip temperature is well-known and repeatable so the proposal from Bill will work just as well, and be much quicker.... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
RIP
|
Exactly!
Since you are posting on the Pass Labs forum I presume you trust The Master's judgement. NP has said in the past not to get too extreme about matching output devices, except possibly for an X type amp. Measuring to 2 decimal places is probably close enough. I measure to 3 places because I can and I've never had measured source currents vary by more than about 40ma which is less than the usual 5% tolerance of the source resistors. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Audio Junkie
diyAudio Member
|
is 12-15V enough for matching or should the devices be match AT the voltage they will run at. IE lets say the amps rails are +/-70vdc. should you match at 70Vdc or is say 15vdc enough?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
just current on which you plan to use them
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
How many significant figures are in your result? eg 100V could be measured to 1significant figure, or two or three or four. The real and accurate voltage is 102.3456V Read to 3 significant figures and an accurate meter should read 102V But if you read to 4significant figures using your 4000count DMM and it is still accurate, your measurement should be 102.3V Yes that is one decimal place, but the important part, that tells everyone what you are conveying, is the 4significant figures. Then you have to look at tolerance. I will only refer you to your user's manual at this time. Then we come to processing the data. If some similar value 4sigfig measurements are added or divided or multiplied then the result of the mathematical processing leaves you with ~4sigfig accuracy. If you subtract similar value 4sigfig numbers, the resulting accuracy can be less than 1sigfig., i.e. equivalent to worthless. eg. subtract 102.3456 V from 102.6543 and the actual result is 0.3087V. two 3sigfig measurements of 102 and 103 would give a poor accuracy result of 1V two 4sigfig measurements 102.3 & 102.7 would give a poor result of 0.4V Notice that both these results are not accurate to 1sigfig. When this type of measuring situation comes up you should look for a different way to measure and process the data so that the result is meaningful. I would use a battery operated DMM to directly measure the difference in voltage between the two voltage sources. A 4000count DMM set to 400.0mV full scale would indicate 308.7mV if it is accurate. Notice that the result of changing the measuring procedure has allowed a result that is equal in accuracy to using a very accurately calibrated 6.5 digit DMM even though you are using 3.7digit DMM. But there is one more effect that can result in big inaccuracies. The loading effect of adding the measuring system to the voltage sources. The ratio of measurement system impedance to voltage source impedance must be very high. Look for at least 100:1 and preferably >=1000:1. Alternatively, calculate the loading effect on you measurement by using the actual impedances of the source and the DMM.
__________________
regards Andrew T. Last edited by AndrewT; 11th October 2010 at 11:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
suddenly - mosfet matching is rocket science .
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
For Power devices, the devices would become too hot to handle. For signal devices the Tj would vary rapidly, making measurement result unrepeatable. It is more usual to use operating current and as low a test voltage as will allow sufficient accuracy of the measurement. Often test voltage can be ~5Vdc
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
RIP
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Testing a Mosfet | vdi_nenna | Pass Labs | 3 | 2nd February 2010 08:21 PM |
| BiCMOS Bipolar+MOSFET better than MOSFET | lineup | Solid State | 5 | 8th December 2009 11:46 AM |
| testing, testing 123 | neil_kaye | Full Range | 0 | 25th December 2005 08:21 PM |
| MOSFET/MOSFET amplifier | jarek | Pass Labs | 21 | 22nd June 2004 05:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12786 seconds (84.32% PHP - 15.68% MySQL) with 11 queries |