|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Since quite a few of us will never have the opportunity to attend the burning amp festival. I thought it would be fun to have a simulation shoot out to promote some friendly competition amongst us fellow diyer's.
The rules are as follow. The design is intended to be a preamp to drive F5 to full power. Gain of the preamp is limited to 2x to 3x The preamp is limited to a maximum of 2 stages. (if you can do it with a single gain stage even better) No balanced or X circuits allowed The design does not need to be original. You can use other peoples designs. Performance is assessed by measuring fft of 4V peak into 100k load at 1000Hz. May the best man/woman win. Ok here is my first attempt. Remember this is meant to be fun. Definitely not intended to be taken seriously.
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
How about this one?
Once I have a few designs here I will build the top 3 designs, and do measurements in the lab to see how they compare to the simulations. Then I will do listening tests to see if there is any correlation between labe results and listening tests. I am a slow mover so it could be some time before I get around to doing this.
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'll be watching this thread, preamps for the F-5 has been at the forefront of much of my thinking lately.
Russellc |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Great Topic.
I've been wondering which is a good preamp, to match up with an F5. Since a power supply is already in place, may as well add a preamp to make an integrated. The F5 has only 15 dB's of gain, so I wonder if a follower design would work. Any follower has a voltage gain of slightly less than 1. Here is a cathode follower I've developed that uses a current source. It seems to be very well behaved when powering up and down. Not sure if the DC blocking cap is needed off of the cathode. . |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Briliant idea
Be watching as well Al |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How about this?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Maybe I should explain this circuit a bit more.
A number of people have used the B1 buffer with the F5 Amp. The B1 is a source follower, with a constant current source. However, I would like a tube in the integrated, so the n jFET in the B1 was replaced with a triode, and the current source was changed. I tested the cathode follower, with a triangle wave generator, and the linearity is quite good. I have not tested the overshoot or settling time, however, since there is no Feedback, its probably good. As I recall, a 6922 requires a 90 Vdc plate voltage, but works just fine with 24Vdc and a constant current source. The tube was biased at around 10 mA = Vbe / 68 ohms Using an oscilloscope, to look at the emitter side of the 68 ohm resistor, shows the current source is quite good. However, the 100nF ceramic cap is needed to increase the stability of the current source. The DC blocking cap is needed before going to the F5 Amp. In the end though, the question is how does this unit sound with the F5 Amp ? Would the combination be too transparent ? Last edited by Uunderhill; 13th November 2010 at 01:06 PM. Reason: technical error |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
don't waste your time with under-voltaged tubes
give them proper voltage and current and they'll shine in this way - 6922 is drek interesting reading - Preamp Cookbook - Wright he knows thing or two ........ look for his SLCF
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
The linearity of the cathode follower circuit looks great with a scope - but how does it sound is the question. I really don't want to get into high voltage power supplies - also, I'd like to use the F5's power supply which is already in the box. How do low voltage tubes sound ? Have you heard a 12AE6, 12U7 or 6GM8 ? Any good ? I see 12ae6's and 12u7's are quite inexpensive - but the price of 6gm8's - ouch ! Sorry to side track things a bit. Last edited by Uunderhill; 13th November 2010 at 02:52 PM. Reason: add pricing information |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Some simple questions for clarification of the rules: -is 4V the amplitude or the peak-to-peak value (i.e. the corresponding amplitude is 2V) ? -the THD is computed from how many harmonics ? Some more complex questions: -how is a stage defined ? Is there a limit on the number of transistors in a stage or in the whole circuit ? -is global negative feed-back (GNFB) allowed ? |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Preamp ideas for F5 | ejfud | Pass Labs | 176 | Today 08:16 AM |
| F5 SPICE Simulation?? | bear | Pass Labs | 4 | 22nd December 2009 09:57 PM |
| Preamp in F5 manual | Beftus | Pass Labs | 2 | 20th November 2009 07:10 PM |
| Cute little preamp inspired by JBoz/F5 | yggdrasil | Pass Labs | 23 | 31st May 2008 05:52 AM |
| Pspice preamp simulation | Antonix | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 10th January 2006 01:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12010 seconds (81.18% PHP - 18.82% MySQL) with 11 queries |