F5 with 2SK2013/2SJ313

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Ex-Moderator R.I.P.
Joined 2005

Attachments

  • F5 Juma 2013 313 rev low.png
    F5 Juma 2013 313 rev low.png
    14.2 KB · Views: 577
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Actually, we can shave this version of F5 a bit more and still make it work nicely.
If we accept lower power (10W RMS @ 8 Ohms) and use the lower voltage in power supply (+/-15V) we can bias the MOSFETs near the zero tempco point (about 0.6A) which will get us rid of NTCs and with carefully chosen JFETs' drain resistors we can avoid trimming pots.
For lower power 2 pairs of output MOSFETs will be OK.

I might try the super-simple configuration posted by Juma in #328 as I already have the required 15V supplies.

I might also try these FETs in the "spare" EUVL F5X I have. I guess this could be done simply by replacing each the J201/K1530 currently in the amp with 3 parallel J313/K2013 and bias to 1.8A. In the F5X each J201/K1530 is biased at 2A (with 15V rails) so I guess no other changes would be necessary.
 
I might try the super-simple configuration...

Pretty much that's it. Just take care when setting bias - don't let the things go wild. I'd do it like this:
- measure MOSFET's Vgs for desired Id (for example 3V @ 0.6A)
- measure JFET's Id with Rs = 10R at desired Vds (about 12V with 15V rails). Let's say you got 6mA.
- calculate JFET's Rd = 3V / 6mA = 500R
- solder first lower standard value resistor (470R) and slowly add series/parallel resistor combinations at both JFETs' drains resitors until you reach hot-state-equilibrium...
 
Quoted on post #451: ...

Actually, post #451 quotes my answer (post #328) to "The Space Egg Corp" in his pursue of simplest working F5 schematic. It's not a clever thing to do, nor a recommendation/suggestion, but only an answer to inquisitive fellow member.

Whoever finds this idea interesting should be fully aware of what's he doing. Otherwise, please don't follow that road.
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Whoever finds this idea interesting should be fully aware of what's he doing.
Then I'm in trouble:eek:

I simply found the idea of biasing to 0.6A to limit thermal excursions very elegant and convenient.

Since Vgs @ 0.6A for these FETs is virtually the same at any temperature it will also be more reliable not to match the devices at operating temperature;)

I will be using pots for biasing - I'm not a suicidal minimalist:)
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.