|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Near Milan
|
Hello to Everyone !
I have a Bride of Zen in my setup and like it Nevertheless I would like to understand if a BOZ with a bjt like, for instance, a 2SC2238 would be feasible or not Which are the most important shortcomings of using a bjt in place of the irf510/610 ? Are mentioned mosfets more linear than a 2SC2238 ? maybe less distorting ? do they have more bandwidth ? Thanks a lot and kind regards, gino |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Well, I'm not familiar with that part but power BJTs required a lot of base drive. So, that would load you're source too much and wouldn't perform too well.
You could try a medium power darlington BJT, with high beta. That might work but I don't know how it would sound.
__________________
My Website: Hyperacusis, Tinnitus, My Story |
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Near Milan
|
Quote:
The part is quite common as driver in power amp, just before the output devices It is a good part, I understand Do you mean that the input impedance would be too low with the bjt ? Quote:
To be clear, I would like to understand better why a mosfet has been selected for a single component gain stage, a solution that intrigues me so much for its excpetional simplicity I like simple things, in the kiss principle way Kind regards, gino |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I looked up the part data sheet, and it has a hFE of just over 100 when biased at 40mA. So, it could conceivably work, but probably wouldn't be to linear with a 10k potentiometer at the input.
If you use a volume control at the output like Pass did, then it would probably work okay, given that your source components have a reasonably low output impedance. But it's not just a plug-in replacement and to get the best performance you'd have to adjust the bias. The bias adjustment circuit Pass used assumed a the high DC input impedance of a MOSFET. So, you have to lower some resistor values so you get enough current to achieve bias stability, and that would also lower the input impedance of the preamp. Well, it might work, but I don't see it as a plug in replacement for the IRF610/510. It would require some redesign work. A Darlington BJT would probably work okay without modification I think. You'd need to adjust the bias to 40mA again. But, I don't know how it would sound.
__________________
My Website: Hyperacusis, Tinnitus, My Story |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Hi,
A BJT in this setup may need a DC servo.... BJT's drift in the wrong direction as they warm up Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Near Milan
|
Quote:
I understand that the mentioned bjt a plug in replacement for the IRF610/510 So basically all the circuit must be re-thought You say I don't know how it would sound I would be curious about that From what I understand the part is of a very high quality, used as a driver in power amps By the way, thank you sincerely again for your kind and helpful advice Kind regards, gino |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Near Milan
|
Quote:
I read about the problem with bjt Mosfets tend to stabilize if I understand well Maybe a lower bias could be used Nevertheless I know of "cold amps" that sound pretty well In the sense that a high bias current is not a guarantee of good sound, and vice versa But my very question would be, is the mosfet intrinsically a better part for that duty (i.e. to amplify 5,6 times a line level signal) ? Is it more linear, does it have a wider bandwidth, is it less distorting, does it have a better slew rate ? Thanks again and best regards, gino |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
|
If copied straight off from BOZ:
The BJT will have lower THD. But a lot worse overtonespectrum. Lousy thermal behaviour. So probaly not worth trying...
__________________
Brgds Lars |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Near Milan
|
Quote:
But with other Ibias, other Vce ? My main regret is to have not a simulation software I think that an idea of the real behaviour could be acheived with a simple simulation, maybe varying the working parameters to find an optimum More in general I like the "philosophy" of using the lowest number of active components in their optimal working conditions But this is very superficial statement Regarding the BOZ using it I found that its performance is so much dependent on the quality of the power supply I think that with a PS of exceptional quality it would be fantastic My own is just very good ... that is not bad indeed Still I think about a bjt BOZ ... Kind regards, gino |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bride of Zen | macgyver | Pass Labs | 8 | 14th October 2004 08:14 AM |
| bjt bride of zen | renjiish | Pass Labs | 1 | 24th September 2004 03:54 PM |
| Bride of Zen, Bride of Son of Zen | 2Bak | Pass Labs | 4 | 12th May 2002 04:51 PM |
| Bride of Zen or Balanced Zen Line Stage? | Mach_Y | Pass Labs | 9 | 28th November 2001 11:07 PM |
| Zen or Bride of Zen as Headphone AMP? | Hauke | Headphone Systems | 5 | 2nd October 2001 06:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11532 seconds (80.37% PHP - 19.63% MySQL) with 10 queries |