|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Here is my idea of a cool source controller... front end for the B1, if you will.
I like the idea of 2 separate pots for each channel. But how to match the level? I guess this is more for anal people (like me ). Well, you measure the voltageout of the pot. It works like this: The controller has the input selection via relays (4 total inputs for each channel) and a mute relay. In addition, there are relays that apply 5v to the pot and a microcontroller with an A/D converter measures the voltage on the wiper. There are 2 sets of everything, one set for each channel. This setup can be a true "dual mono" preamp/buffer. The relays that apply the voltage to the pot also connect the digital ground to the analog ground. When in normal listen mode, there are no connections between the digital circuit and the analog circuit. Furthermore, the A/D converters are not sampling during listen mode, so there really isn't any way for noise to pollute the analog signal. There are 2 modes, listen and mute. Whenever the mute is active, then so is the matching function. The left-most button activates the mute. Each input has it's own indicator LED and the Mute/Match indicator is a green/red bicolor LED that lights up red when not matched and changes to green when both channels are matched. This concept allow any pots to be used, you can even use different values because it is simply measuring the divided voltage on the output of the pot. If you use a linear pot, then the full 10-bit resolution of the A/D can be used for 1024 levels, including ground. The matching depends on the performance of the A/D, which I haven't investigated yet. The first prototypes have log taper pots, which forced me to divide down the sample value to an 8-bit number so that the channels could be matched at higher parts of the taper where a tiny touch of the knob results in a large resistance change. I plan to change the board layout again to not have the pot mounted on it. That way I can experiment with different pots and choose the ones that I like the sound of. I ordered some precision multi-turn wire-wound pots to try out. This concept is probably the only way a multi-turn pot is practical! It's a work in progress, but so far it works quite well (at matching). I haven't put everything together yet to make a complete unit, but I'm getting there.
__________________
1N4733 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
|
I calculated the channel matching accuracy and it turns out to be quite good.
Assuming a bit error of the A/D converter of + or - 1/2 LSB, the channel to channel matching is + or - .004 dB at full volume and .267 dB at 1/64th volume. The matching error is worst at very low volume levels because the bit error of the A/D is a fixed value regardless of where the level control position is set. I didn't calculate the error for each of the possible 1023 levels, only for a reasonable range of 1/64th to full volume. I think this accuracy is great and I can't wait to get everything put together!
__________________
1N4733 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
I wondered about doing this some time ago, before going for a relay controlled system.
How quickly does your system change to the desired setting? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Lovely concept. Now even the deaf will be able to enjoy a perfectly centered stereo image by just looking at an led and having a steady hand. But isn't this still too difficult? How about one pot is set by hand and the other is motorised and automatically matches the position?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
|
Wouldn't this be good hooked up to a Lightspeed?
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
|
It is very quick. The A/D samples many times per second.
__________________
1N4733 |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
is not the kind of complexity I want. I am perfectly content with manual controls.
__________________
1N4733 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| trouble matching line level to guitar amp input level...any help? | mondogenerator | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 19th December 2009 10:00 AM |
| speaker level input vs line level question | crippledchicken | Subwoofers | 4 | 17th July 2007 03:36 AM |
| lesser of two evils, high level -> line level, digital volume control | mazurek | Solid State | 3 | 19th November 2006 12:25 AM |
| How best to control input level? | Dave Varner | Chip Amps | 1 | 2nd February 2004 06:06 PM |
| BOSOZ level control | timo | Pass Labs | 8 | 16th June 2002 05:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |