B1 Active Crossover - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st December 2009, 03:09 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Jacques Merde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Default B1 Active Crossover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas Ojala View Post
The B1 buffer is essentially a voltage follower.
A voltage follower is also an essential part of a Linkwitz-Riley filter.
See this: Active Filters

Has anyone tried the B1 voltage follower as a component in a Linkwitz-Riley filter?
Here is my initial cut at a 2 pole LR filter using B1. This one crosses over at roughly 700 Hz (for my own personal project). Other frequencies are, of course, easily implemented. The filter seemed to lend itself to the symmetric supply topology, so that's what I have drawn here. I'm planning to use a beefed up Salas shunt regulator with this, as in the building-symmetrical-psu-b1-buffer thread.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf LR2.pdf (8.1 KB, 3289 views)
__________________
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 04:31 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
maxlorenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: osorno , Chile
Hi Jacques Merde,

Thank you for posting your filter schematics.
That is the same approach I will take in the distant future for my 1KHz filter, safe that:
1) I can use balanced input signal from TVC so I will put a balanced to unbalanced input buffer instead of a B1.

2) Pots are usually noisier than good quality R so instead of using that 22K pot I will let fixed the HF output and only use a resistor based attenuator for adjusting the bass output. This brings more transparency to the sound, IMHO.

Good luck,
M
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 09:51 AM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacques Merde View Post
Here is my initial cut at a 2 pole LR filter using B1. This one crosses over at roughly 700 Hz (for my own personal project). Other frequencies are, of course, easily implemented. The filter seemed to lend itself to the symmetric supply topology, so that's what I have drawn here. I'm planning to use a beefed up Salas shunt regulator with this, as in the building-symmetrical-psu-b1-buffer thread.
brilliant!
It looks so simple. Unity gain and equal value R & C automatically gives Q=0.5 for the L-R function and makes it so simple to match components.
Be careful to check for DC at the outputs. Both at switch on and as the devices warm up. The low pass is particularly susceptible since it is completely DC coupled all the way through.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 02:57 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Jacques Merde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
maxlorenz and AndrewT,

Thanks for the good suggestions. At the moment, I am more concerned with dealing with the issue of the Sallen-Key topology where, for the low pass filter, the finite output impedance of the buffer in combination with the feedback capacitor provides a for a forward signal shunt path which manifests itself as poor stop band response. In this case and with these component values, the difficulties are well within the audio band. This can be addressed in a number of ways, so I am back to the drawing board to do some thinking....

Cheers,
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LR12.ORIG.jpg (227.0 KB, 5082 views)
__________________
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 09:41 PM   #5
njepitt is offline njepitt  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacques Merde View Post
Here is my initial cut at a 2 pole LR filter using B1. This one crosses over at roughly 700 Hz (for my own personal project). Other frequencies are, of course, easily implemented. The filter seemed to lend itself to the symmetric supply topology, so that's what I have drawn here. I'm planning to use a beefed up Salas shunt regulator with this, as in the building-symmetrical-psu-b1-buffer thread.
Hi everyone,

I think the circuit Jacques Merde posted here is fascinating, but can I ask a couple of possibly stupid questions?

1. Am I right in thinking the 22k pots shown in the circuit are trimpots, to set the relative levels for LP and HP? I presume the normal volume pots would come before this circuit altogether, right?

2. I presume "B+" and "B-" denote symmetric DC voltages from the power supply. Normal B1 values?

3. If you want to change the crossover point then you mess with the 22nF and 10.2k values throughout and leave everything else unchanged, correct?

4. At first sight this seems to be another place where one could use BF862 in place of 2SK170. The preamp juma designed (and which I may well build) uses the BF862 in a B1-type circuit with gain, to good reports. I've used the BF862 in a mini-aleph style amp (following juma's orientation), and like it a good deal. Is there any reason this circuit couldn't be done all SMD, with BF862 throughout? If you wanted to do this, what caps would you use?

Cheers

Nigel
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 09:46 PM   #6
njepitt is offline njepitt  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maine
Another one: AndrewT mentioned matching components, but what specifically ought to be matched here?

Cheers

Nigel
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 10:44 PM   #7
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
each filter has a pair of equal R and a pair of equal C.
A crossover comprises a pair of filters.
That takes us up to 4off R and 4off C.
Stereo requires two channels. That brings our total to 8off R and 8off C.
For exceptional quality in rolloff and crossover characteristics and in channel matching all these R & C can be matched to <1% tolerance.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 11:00 PM   #8
njepitt is offline njepitt  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
each filter has a pair of equal R and a pair of equal C.
A crossover comprises a pair of filters.
That takes us up to 4off R and 4off C.
Stereo requires two channels. That brings our total to 8off R and 8off C.
For exceptional quality in rolloff and crossover characteristics and in channel matching all these R & C can be matched to <1% tolerance.
Thanks. So, no matching of jfets (other than recommended for normal B1, I mean). Since close tolerance SMD components (resistors, anyway) are pretty cheap, wouldn't this be another reason for doing a surface-mount version? (Or did I miss something?)

Cheers

Nigel
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009, 12:54 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Jacques Merde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by njepitt View Post
Hi everyone,

I think the circuit Jacques Merde posted here is fascinating, but can I ask a couple of possibly stupid questions?

1. Am I right in thinking the 22k pots shown in the circuit are trimpots, to set the relative levels for LP and HP? I presume the normal volume pots would come before this circuit altogether, right?

2. I presume "B+" and "B-" denote symmetric DC voltages from the power supply. Normal B1 values?

3. If you want to change the crossover point then you mess with the 22nF and 10.2k values throughout and leave everything else unchanged, correct?

4. At first sight this seems to be another place where one could use BF862 in place of 2SK170. The preamp juma designed (and which I may well build) uses the BF862 in a B1-type circuit with gain, to good reports. I've used the BF862 in a mini-aleph style amp (following juma's orientation), and like it a good deal. Is there any reason this circuit couldn't be done all SMD, with BF862 throughout? If you wanted to do this, what caps would you use?

Cheers

Nigel
Hello Nigel,

1. Correct on both counts. My thinking is that the trimpots exist for the general case where one doesn't have advance knowledge of the system the crossover will be used in. Once the correct levels have been determined, the trimpots could be removed and replaced by jumpers and/or fixed resistor dividers for a more permanent installation.

2. Correct. I was thinking of +/- 9 or 10 volts, like the DCB1.

3. Correct.

4. I don't see any reason not to build this with a BF862. I haven't really put any thought into SMD cap selection at this point.

Quote:
Thanks. So, no matching of jfets (other than recommended for normal B1, I mean). Since close tolerance SMD components (resistors, anyway) are pretty cheap, wouldn't this be another reason for doing a surface-mount version? (Or did I miss something?)
Correct, no special matching of JFETs, other than for Idss. As far as component matching goes, Panasonic 1% film caps are available from Digi-Key in those values, and 1% resistors are commonplace. AndrewT's thinking here is essentially identical to mine.

It's easier, for me anyway, to swap out leaded parts, but I don't see any reason not to build a SMD version.

These are all reasonable questions -- not stupid questions

I do have a solution for the low pass bandstop response issue, which I will post later.

Thanks,
__________________
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009, 01:19 AM   #10
Tea-Bag is offline Tea-Bag  United States
not politcally affiliated
diyAudio Member
 
Tea-Bag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kennebunk
Blog Entries: 7
Jaq.
I think this is a cool design, worthy of it's own thread.
__________________
Salas Boards 2014 #2 SHIPPED |F5TC board and power supplies available PM | Hot-Rod DCB1 boards and kits available PM |Mesmerize kits available (no boards)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOX active crossover buy tiroth Group Buys 262 11th September 2014 08:24 PM
MOX - active crossover moamps Analog Line Level 235 11th September 2014 08:21 PM
Passive crossover into active crossover hahfran Multi-Way 16 10th February 2008 06:16 PM
XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage promitheus Pass Labs 18 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2