|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Göteborg
|
![]() In the above simplified circuit, what impact on the distortion, gain and soundquality would different choices of the top transistor have? I can imagine using a TIP141 darlington (a really well known audiophile part! I will not build the circuit above, it just serves as a reference for the discussion.
__________________
We live in a horizontal world, why use vertical topologies??? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
From the discussion I have read, it seems that as long as the cascode device is used within its power limitations, then it does not contribute much in the way of sound quality.
I have been playing around with a few cascoded designs, but I am yet to hear them, so I can't make a comment based on personal experience. I remember Nelson saying the cascode device has little affect on the sound in his Zen 9 (F3) amp.
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." Last edited by Melon Head; 3rd December 2009 at 07:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Göteborg
|
Quote:
__________________
We live in a horizontal world, why use vertical topologies??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Formerly Thanh1973
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
What I am intending to do is compare a Lateral Mosfet vs Vertical Mosfet, vs Jfet, vs Bipolar. Hopefully I will get time to do this over the Christmas Holidays.
__________________
"No, this sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need." |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
Quote:
real plain cascode isn't anything else than umbrella for active part . but - in case where you wish to implement any sort of "modulated" cascode , where cascode element became active part itself , I agree that choice of part is certainly important issue .
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Göteborg
|
Quote:
Is this soo or am i wrong.
__________________
We live in a horizontal world, why use vertical topologies??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
|
well - put enough current through bias divider , use part which have low enough Rdson (meaning low enough comparing to load impedance ) , and I think everything is OK - in real world ....... usual problem with cascode is wimpy current through bias string .
speaking of that - seems that wimpy current is pretty offten problem in audio gadgets ........ but that's just my opinion ....... same as all opinions of mine ....... are my opinions ......
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I've played with cascodes (SK246) on JFET (SK170) input stages (single transistor, diff and complementary). In all these amps cascoding is one of the very few mods that actually changes the tonality of the amp. The sound is "lighter/leaner", cleaner and the mid is experienced as attenuated with a less forward presentation. The difference isn't major, but I believe it's there.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KL
|
higher transconductance part for cascode result in less miller cap.
lower Cgs par for cascode produce less input referred noise. Does it result in better sound? ur guess is better than mine. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
in this case also this thread could be of interest:
Aleph (Single Ended) + Larvadin (no Memory Distortion) = Ultimate Aleph? second stage of figure 6.2 as first stage about http://peufeu.free.fr/audio/memory/memory-6-test.html include additional jFET input buffer and for second stage Andrea Ciuffoli's "Power Follower" about http://www.audiodesignguide.com/Powe...wer/index.html must actually present the royal approach Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 15th December 2009 at 06:56 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cascoded Boz | gionag | Pass Labs | 3 | 19th March 2008 08:08 PM |
| 6SN7 Cascoded CCS | korneluk | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 25th November 2007 10:02 AM |
| Jfet Cascoded BOZ | bobsinclar | Pass Labs | 26 | 21st September 2007 07:23 PM |
| Cascoded mu-follower | jnb | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 9th September 2007 10:28 PM |
| Cascoded ZV7 | Fuling | Pass Labs | 17 | 6th December 2006 03:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10606 seconds (79.93% PHP - 20.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |