|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, N.S.
|
Hi all,
I've been building a B1, and I've decided to add a discrete voltage regulator in order to learn a bit. I've got enough space on my board for a Sulzer regulator like the one pictured here: http://www.alw.audio.dsl.pipex.com/i...sulzer_sch.gif The only problems I'm having is which pass transistor to use. The 2n3053 is no longer produced, and even when it was, it was in a to-39 package which isn't so easy to use on my board. The d44h11 as used in newer regulators of this type (like the Jung super-regulator) has a minimum hfe of 60, but the B1 is said to only draw 20mA or so. I'm a bit of a newb... does this mean the B1 doesn't draw enough current to allow a d44h11 to operate? If this is the case, can anyone suggest an appropriate pass transistor? thanks in advance, -j |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If I understand your question, hfe used to be called beta, the transistor current gain. Ic = Beta * Ib
I do not see where this regulator has a min current requirement. It may have a minimum requirement for hfe.
__________________
Scienta sine ars nihil est - Science without Art is nothing. (Implies the converse as well) Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, N.S.
|
Oh, I see. The Collector Cutoff Current of the d44h11 is 10uA, which is very small indeed. Am I correct in thinking the Collector Cutoff Current is the minimum current which can flow through the transistor when it is "on"? With a min hfe (or Beta as you said) of 60, this would mean that the base current could be as low as 0.17uA for this circuit to work (which should be the case)?
I guess I need to read more about how this circuit works. :-) thanks, -j |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
These types of regulators work well at even very small load currents. Still, would not hurt to preload it with a resistor - i always do it in the belief that this improves transient performance.
It's a great idea to use a proper regulator with such a simple circuit. Will be interesting to know your assessment of the sound. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sulzer regulator | starushz | Power Supplies | 25 | 21st June 2011 12:57 AM |
| voltage rating of sulzer | TUBESMAN | Power Supplies | 5 | 25th June 2008 01:01 PM |
| Sulzer-Borbely SB-1 regulator | Vigier | Solid State | 6 | 10th November 2004 07:30 AM |
| sulzer reg | costiss | Solid State | 3 | 2nd February 2003 12:54 PM |
| OPA637/627 for sulzer instead of AD817/AD797? | kasra | Solid State | 10 | 22nd January 2003 08:57 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08945 seconds (65.93% PHP - 34.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |