|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
I would like to ask Nelson if ''burning in'' components is a well defined concept?
I have read in hifi magazines and heard that burning in is supposed to improve the sound. What basis is there for this idea? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
I will only address burn in from the standpoint of an electronics
manufacturer, which is the thing I know with some authority. We burn products in for two reasons - 1. We want to see if anything fails. 2. We want to readjust the amplifier against any drift in performance that comes with a burn-in. Some amplifiers depend on delicate balances between components to achieve best performance, and are tweaked to a "sweet spot". Something like a First Watt F5 or an F3 is a fine example of an amp which appreciates being tweaked back into the sweet spot after burn-in. The difference might be reasonably subtle - distortion drifting over the range of .002% to .01%, or bias drifting a few percent. Some, like an F4, don't depend on the subtle interactions of components, and rarely appreciate re-adjustment after burn-in.
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vienna, Ostrich
|
Quote:
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Burning Amp Festival-Burning Gadgets Preview | Zen Mod | Everything Else | 115 | 27th October 2007 05:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |