BOZ bias adjustment help - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th July 2008, 10:21 PM   #1
rtate is offline rtate  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Default BOZ bias adjustment help

I just got a boz and want to set up the bias as it has been in storage for a couple of years.

The pass lab diy article says to set up for 40ma by adjusting P102 for 4v across R108.

I have read that in order to prevent clipping with a digital source the bias needs to be lower, around 28-32ma and should be set up with a scope.

I don't have a scope so I was wondering if someone could tell me what the voltage across R108 would be to achieve around 30ma bias...
Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 01:23 AM   #2
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
It would be 3V (0.03A * 100 = 3).

Actually the more probable issue is input overload, and higher bias
raises the input overload figure.

If overload is an issue, then I suggest some input attenuation. Many
have found that using both input and output pots is useful. A 10K
pot can be adjusted so that the maximum volume that you will actually
use is achieved when the output pot is at max, and thereafter the
output pots becomes your volume control.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 04:52 AM   #3
rtate is offline rtate  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Thank you for the response!!

So should I leave the bias at 40ma and use input attenuation only
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 10:08 AM   #4
hates ground loops
diyAudio Member
 
Rodeodave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in the alps
Blog Entries: 1
A lower value for R104, say 820R (original value 1k 3W), reduces the gain, right?
__________________
Gravity - Making the G since 13.7 billion B.C.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 01:40 PM   #5
traw is offline traw  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
or is it more preferrable to adjust the 100R?..... the 1k || output load / 100 (source resistor) = voltage gain.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 07:37 PM   #6
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
You can do that, but I will reiterate: The usual problem is input
overload, which is not fixed by adjusting the gain per se.

A higher value that 100 ohms will increase the input overload
voltage, and so could be helpful with the same bias current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 08:43 AM   #7
Vix is offline Vix  Yugoslavia
diyAudio Member
 
Vix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
A bit OT....

I was looking into ways to improve my BOZ. Actually, it won't be a Boz at all. Instead, I was thinging to add a current source and feedback, transforming it into an Aleph L. However, since I'd like to keep the volume control at the input, I was thinging of adding the B1 buffer in front of BoZ/Aleph L. Not too complicated, and should sound better than a plain BoZ. Or not...?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 09:34 AM   #8
Manu is offline Manu  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Manu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vienna, Ostrich
Quote:
Originally posted by Vix
A bit OT....

... Aleph L.

Me too.
ALEPH L is sure one of the best pre I have ever heard.
And remains my fave ... If you look at PassDiy-gallery : among the PL-clone, it seems the L didn't retain so much attention from the DIYer - which I don't understand.

With some high-level sources input overload can be an issue ... in few case I had to provide some attenuation at the input (res in serie ... not tried pot). But generally, when its not expressly needed, I prefer whitout input attenuation as I feel it (somewhat) degrades the gorgiousness of the sound ...

I don't know why.

Manu
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 10:46 AM   #9
Vix is offline Vix  Yugoslavia
diyAudio Member
 
Vix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
Quote:
Originally posted by Manu


But generally, when its not expressly needed, I prefer whitout input attenuation as I feel it (somewhat) degrades the gorgiousness of the sound ...

I don't know why.

Manu
Yup. There are some arguments that the opposite should be the case. With the lower input, distortion of the preamp should be lower.
On the other hand, with the attenuation at the output, the noise is lower. Which brings us to a conclusion that we may be more sensitive to circuit noise than to a bit more distortion...


Vix
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 03:46 AM   #10
rtate is offline rtate  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
So, is Mr. Pass suggesting to change the value of R106 or is it R108?

What sort a value would be appropriate?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yamaha R-3,RX-300 bias adjustment spongebob-2005 Solid State 1 18th November 2006 01:21 PM
KT88 Bias Adjustment batinal Tubes / Valves 7 20th May 2006 05:16 AM
Bias adjustment question n0plb Tubes / Valves 20 5th May 2005 01:21 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2