|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Wanted to add my thanks for the article too... Being new to this, articles like that sure help.
Wonder if the "Our meters don’t go to zero." bit is akin to the Spinal Tap volume 11 bit |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Is there a general principle that can be stated about the relative quality of generating overall bias current X through n devices vs. through m devices where n < m?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
I found Fig.4 particularly interesting, and presume they showed the distortion of a single pair of complementary devices at the said bias current.
I wonder what the distortion would look like if the same bias current is shared between say 4 pairs of the same devices in parallel, each device only take 1/4 of the bias current as in Fig.4. Would you perhaps care to comment on this ? Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Hey! That's my question!
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The one and only
|
This question is commonly asked. Certainly the performance is
not identical for both cases, but there is a cancellation factor. With parallel devices the transconductance as a whole goes up, lowering the distortion because the variation per device is lower by virtue of sharing the current. At the same time, if the bias is divided between devices, the distortion per device goes up. The two effects do not give an exact cancellation, but it's close enough that for most applications you can decide on the number of parallel devices based on dissipation needs. One factor that tends to favor parallel devices is that the total bias dissipation can be larger even for the same size heat sink, since there's less aggregate thermal resistance from the junctions to the sink. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
> The two effects do not give an exact cancellation, but it's close enough that for most applications you can decide on the number of parallel devices based on dissipation needs.
Perhaps the distortion level is comparable, but how about the spectrum -- does the ratio between say 2nd, 3rd, 4th remain largerly the same, or do they shift one way or another ? Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth
|
"Klunk!" -Your amplifier has just left class A operation! Consequently, small aliens will invade the transistors in your amp, generating distortion. Hence you will experience an instant decrease of sound quality, depriving you of listening pleasures, which may have side effects, such as insomnia. Consequently, you will have only two choices. First, you may turn down the volume (that you don't want), or, burn mo' power, to keep the green aliens away. If this statement does not make any sense to you, please go back to post nr.1 of this thread and read the paper. "Klunk"!
![]() No, seriously, nice paper. By the way, if we connect more devices parallel, the capacitance also increases, making the output more difficult to drive?
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vienna, Ostrich
|
Mr. Pass, dear Papa,
referring to page 7, you suggest a ccs as best SE Bias for PP topology. What would you advocate instead of a Res to V- solution ...? Manu |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
The one and only
|
The resistor works fine as long as the supply isn't too noisy.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reading Leaving Class A . . . | Babowana | Pass Labs | 11 | 4th October 2009 02:09 AM |
| Leaving D.I.Y everything must go sale...... | exurbia | Swap Meet | 36 | 15th October 2008 04:42 AM |
| bg and suggestions of leaving the amp on | jarthel | Parts | 3 | 29th June 2007 02:16 AM |
| Leaving X-former powered up | Wynand | Power Supplies | 4 | 16th May 2006 02:07 AM |
| Leaving. | fdegrove | Everything Else | 23 | 2nd December 2002 09:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10880 seconds (78.04% PHP - 21.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |