F5 power amplifier - Page 91 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th May 2008, 09:09 PM   #901
diyAudio Member
 
vdi_nenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PA, USA
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via Yahoo to vdi_nenna
Default Any Schematic Changes?

Did the schematic values change from the original on page 1?
Did it evolve while I wasn't looking?

Wait a minute...I just found the article.

Nice description of the heat sink, Nelson. Can't go wrong there!

Thanks,

V~
__________________
I build, therefore I am.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 09:44 PM   #902
diyAudio Member
 
apassgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
Quote:
Originally posted by Goffe
I made some changes, the J-fets are together and the feedback resistors closer. Dimension 10x3.8cm

Any advice please?

/Goffe

I Would suggest you move R13 throu R17 much coser to the power transistor, idem on the other side. It can be done very easy.

This is because R13 should be as close as posible to the Gate pin to avoid oscilations.

Otherwise the layout looks pretty good even though I din't check trace connections.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 10:23 PM   #903
TimS is offline TimS  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland
Quote:
Originally posted by jackinnj
Who mentioned tweaking R1/2 ? -
You can tweak the ratio of R1/R2, by a tiny amount, to improve cancellation of the 2nd harmonic. but you need a THD meter to check what you are doing is going in the right direction.


For anybody who what's to know the reason...

It is because for any amplifier circuit the the ratio of the feedback resistors only approximates the gain of the circuit because the open loop gain also has an affect too.

The equation for the actual gain is:
G = Vout/Vin = A/(1 + AxB)
Where A is the amps open loop gain.
and for a non inverting circuit B = Ri/(Rf + Ri) (or for the F5: R1 / (R5||R7+R1) or 10/(50+10)

In a normal opamp A is very high and A/(1 + A) is effectively equal to 1 so the equation simplifies to: Vout/Vin = 1/B = (Rf+Ri)/Ri

Now for the crux
In the F5 design there is effectively 2 amplifiers with 2 feedback loops and 2 corresponding open loop gains.
The first amp consist of Q1 and Q3 and the second is Q2 and Q4.
The open loop gain each amp is different which causes the closed loop gain curves to be slightly different.
If the gain curve of each half is identical then the distortions in each half is identical and then the distortions will be equal and opposite and can cancel each other out.
So if you tweak the closed loop gain of each feedback network it is possible to make the gains to be almost identical and greatly improve the 2nd harmonic distortion.

Cheers

Tim
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 10:27 PM   #904
Variac is offline Variac  United States
diyAudio Editor
 
Variac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
Goffe,

I don't know much, but since Nelson said

Quote:
my preference is to just glue them (The Thermisters) to the top of the plastic (The Output Devices)
I added what is in parentases.

Maybe it would be better to have the thermistor pads right next to the Output device pads so you don't need extension wires to connect the thermistors? Maybe switch the thermistor pad and related resistors with the V+or V- pads . It would be OK to have the V+/- pads more inboard I think...

Also, since the V+/- would be closer to t he center then, maybe have thin traces from the V+ and V- each come to a pad closer to a ground pad to hook up LEDs (blue of course.. - maybe on either side of the input? If you bother with the LED idea, having resistor pads next to the pads for the LED is helpful to reduce the voltage..
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2008, 10:55 PM   #905
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
so your method is to tape on printout for drilling holes (got to find real tiny bits, hmmm)
I have used muriatic and hydrogen peroxide to etch--it works very well.

Tom Gootee had a detailed description on his website how to do it.

The really neat part of his process is using a printout of your circuit (on laserjet photopaper) as an iron-on. (apparently laser jet toner is mostly plastic). You get a really proffessional looking circuit board.

JJ
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 12:04 AM   #906
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by jupiterjune

The really neat part of his process is using a printout of your circuit (on laserjet photopaper) as an iron-on. (apparently laser jet toner is mostly plastic). You get a really proffessional looking circuit board.

JJ
I have tried this method. I also read that photopaper should be used, but it must have been another type. Got good results with standard 80g laser/copier paper.

After etching I ironed on a silk screen.

Johnny
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 12:22 AM   #907
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...67#post1494067

From earlier in this thread. My first toner transfer PCB. Easy and quite serviceable.


7/10
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 05:42 AM   #908
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
> So if you tweak the closed loop gain of each feedback network it is possible to make the gains to be almost identical and greatly improve the 2nd harmonic distortion.

Or you can also measure the transcoductances of the 4 transistors beforehand, and make sure (by design) that the open loop gains of both halves are identical. This is what I do.


Patrick
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 08:06 AM   #909
TimS is offline TimS  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland
Quote:
Originally posted by EUVL
> So if you tweak the closed loop gain of each feedback network it is possible to make the gains to be almost identical and greatly improve the 2nd harmonic distortion.

Or you can also measure the transcoductances of the 4 transistors beforehand, and make sure (by design) that the open loop gains of both halves are identical. This is what I do.


Patrick
That is true if you are using the closely matched 2SK1530 and 2SJ201 but it would be unlikely if you used the IRF240 and IRF9240.

The good thing about this complementary feedback topology is you can get low distortion without matched parts and then you can tweak it to do better.

Cheers

Tim

  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2008, 09:02 AM   #910
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: manila,PH
Sorry this is OT:

whats the thread size of this hex screw?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg screw.jpg (8.1 KB, 2140 views)
__________________
Pinoy ikaw ay pinoy... ipakita sa mundo... kung ano ang kaya mo...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rockford Fosgate Power 20001 bd amplifier power rating?? pachoorion Car Audio 8 8th May 2011 11:49 PM
Power transformers versus amplifier output power..what is your option? destroyer X Solid State 38 9th May 2009 06:23 PM
McIntosh Power Amplifier Power Guard johnnyrt Solid State 2 23rd August 2007 11:22 PM
Output power for a power amplifier Progg70 Solid State 33 10th September 2006 09:44 AM
Amplifier 3000 Wats Rms Power + Smps Higcht Power Bestiality MARAVILLASAUDIO Class D 1 5th November 2004 05:06 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2