|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#5691 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norway, -north of the moral circle..
|
It's for cleaning away all that blur from soldering smoke.....
__________________
While the Lie leapt from Bagdad to Constantinopel, the Truth was still looking for it's sandals! |
|
|
|
#5692 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
4A is too much for a single pair. Keep the dissipation under 50W per device.
__________________
"an amp so simple, even a cave man could build it" |
|
|
|
|
#5693 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Parallel devices may not be the best for low level sonic resolution. So it is better to keep the bias down to 1.6 amps per side (3.2 amps for balanced F5). But it is so challenging and difficult to decide between the stock F5, balanced F5 and Cascoded F5. Ofcourse one could build all and then decide but I simply don't want to add to all the unused stuff lying in my rented workshop. Simply can't get rid of the ever increasing pile. Plus it will be such a shame to scrap any version of the F5!!
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
#5694 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Maybe make one channel point to point.
Try every version, and then choose the one you like best.
__________________
"an amp so simple, even a cave man could build it" |
|
|
|
#5695 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austria, Villach
|
|
|
|
|
#5696 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Just make sure it's not high strength beer otherwise instead of putting out the fire you'll probably burn the house down ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
"an amp so simple, even a cave man could build it" |
|
|
|
|
#5697 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Mstr,
Thanks for sharing your nice photos and congratulations. I am intrigued...how the sound compares to the analog rig, left superior corner on the third photo?
|
|
|
|
#5698 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austria, Villach
|
Hi maxlorenz,
well, thatīs a little bit difficult to say, because the valve amp needs to be serviced, and I havenīt powered it up since 2007. So blind tests between both are not possible, BUT: even if I cannot do direct comparisons, the F5 is definetly much better, especially at low frequencys (the EL34-Amp lacks a bit auf defined bass) and the most convincing fact is that the F5 has much more resolution and better tracability of the soundstage. Hard to find the right words in english, but I would say the F5 also has more silence, everything sounds more relaxed, and I dont miss anything in the frequency response of this amp. So, in short words: after first listening sessions with the F5, I never ever spent a thought about repairing the tube amp. ![]() best regards, Michael |
|
|
|
#5699 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hello
I would like to ask some (help) opinion about a high power F5X with out cascode using multiple power mosfet. It is possible to use 3pair power mosfet / channel powered from 24V rail power supp. based on the the attached schematic ? I like these simple schematic (unfortunately it is hard to read any value of the components) any way probably with 24V rail would need adjust most of the resistor values . In case someone interested for a high power F5X please let me know . We could make some plan together ,I do not have the skill to modify the schematic to a high power verizon . I have 14PC 2SK1528 & 18PC 2SJ200 matched Toshiba mosfet , JETs , a 20-0-20VAC 1.5KVA Plitron toroid & monster heat sink (enclosure) over 25lb. I would like to use these to build a F5X instead a high power F5 . The (enclosure) heat sink was design for a Aleph2 but I like the X topology better. I have a Aleph X , I like the sound of the X so much , it would be great a high power F5X . Thank for any advise or help . Greets |
|
|
|
#5700 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you do the x version you won't really need 3 pairs on each half (2 pairs per half will do), unless of course you want to bias greater than 6A (3A per half).
It is very straight forward to do. Go for it Tell us what bias and rail voltage you are intending on using. The only thing that might be a bit tricky could possbly be adjusting dc offset
__________________
"an amp so simple, even a cave man could build it" Last edited by thanh1973; 10th November 2009 at 06:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
| AudioLapDance |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Power transformers versus amplifier output power..what is your option? | destroyer X | Solid State | 38 | 9th May 2009 05:23 PM |
| McIntosh Power Amplifier Power Guard | johnnyrt | Solid State | 2 | 23rd August 2007 10:22 PM |
| Output power for a power amplifier | Progg70 | Solid State | 33 | 10th September 2006 08:44 AM |
| Amplifier 3000 Wats Rms Power + Smps Higcht Power Bestiality | MARAVILLASAUDIO | Class D | 1 | 5th November 2004 04:06 PM |
| Rockford Fosgate Power 20001 bd amplifier power rating?? | pachoorion | Car Audio | 7 | 23rd October 2004 04:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14081693 seconds (61.01% PHP - 38.99% MySQL) with 11 queries |