Balanced Zen Line Stage Pre-amp R15 Sound Quality - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th November 2001, 07:00 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Super_BQ's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Zealand / Canada
Send a message via ICQ to Super_BQ Send a message via Yahoo to Super_BQ
In the middle of testing 1 channel of my "Balance Line Stage" pre-amp and would like to know if others have experienced the same problem when R15 is changed.

The pre-amp is running fully balanced and my cdp is outputing +4 dBU. Also the voltage drain rails on the mosfets (IRF610) are near 40 volts. I've omitted pots. P3 & P4 and using a quad ganged 10 Kohm switched attenuator for P1 & P2. Now for the beef.

I find that the sound quality is MUCH better when R15 is say approx. 200 ohms or LESS (less than 25db). However, this is contrary to what is show in the "performance notes" (links below). Normally there's more distortion when the gain increases (as the R15 value increases)?

When R15 is set say 400 ohms or more, the pre-amp seems to clip / distort the signal more readily when the attenuator is turned up. But at R15 at 124 ohms, the attenuator can be set at a higher volume level before clipping/distorting. I figure i'm not getting enough voltage swing from the circuit when the gain is low?

Following links for reference:

What do you guys have for R15 set at? Any recommendations that I can do? I'm quite happy leaving R15 at 124 ohms but if there's a way to gain better sound and performance.. please let me know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2001, 01:43 PM   #2
fcel is offline fcel  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: LA County
I'm in the process of getting all the parts together to built this pre-amp. I'll let you know after I built it. But for now, could you tell me where you bought the 4-gang
potentiometer, how much and the brand name? I'm going to use two 2-gang ALPS potentiometers but I would prefer 4-gang if it's very reasonably priced.
Your post did mentioned that it's a switched attenuator, so I assume it's one of those $300 DACT pot?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2001, 08:06 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
Super_BQ's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Zealand / Canada
Send a message via ICQ to Super_BQ Send a message via Yahoo to Super_BQ
Default 4 gang - attenuator

fcel, the attenuator i bought is made by Electroswitch. Their website is at - specifically

I've looked at the DACTs before and IMHO, they are quite simply a ripoff if they're ONLY used in an active preamp. But to be used as a passive preamp ; then that's a horse of a different colour - cost MAY be justified.

The ones I bought were on sale - I think I paid $40 usd each + taxes/shipping. One of the reason for buying a switched attenuator is because i'm using the pre-amp fully balanced. But if in the case of being single ended, I think almost any cheap pot will do since the +/- source/output leads do not have to be in precision gang settings.

Since I built a voltage divider, ideally I wouldn't mind getting an 8 ganged attenuator (if they make one?)- that way instead of the signal being passed through several resistors in the attenuator, I could just have the signal pass through only 2 resistors for each lead (4 per channel). Of course I could use 2 separate 4 gang attenuators (1 for each channel) but I don't like the idea of using separate left/right channel dials.

Now to see if anyone has played around with the values of R15 and had the same findings as I did?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2001, 10:18 PM   #4
grataku is offline grataku  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
Boy, everybody and their grandpa are building this pre-amp! That's good, we are all in this together!
I am still waiting for the transformer, so I won't be testing for awhile.
Did you see anything strange on the scope? Is anything clipping (inputPRE -outputCD, or after the power amp)?
Unless you are GRollins, hearing the difference between 0.01 and 0.1 THD is going to be tricky.
So there is a chance that what you are hearing is something that is being driven too hard or to clipping.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2001, 12:22 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
I thought I heard a mosquito sneeze!


P.S.: Although the project is on hold for the moment, I'll be sticking a modified Balanced Line Stage on the front of the SOZ w/current sources project outlined elsewhere.

[Edited by GRollins on 11-15-2001 at 07:26 PM]
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2001, 03:19 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane Australia
I am struggling to find decent competitively priced stepped attenuators/dual gang pots/2 pole >12 throw switches suitable for volume control for either of the pass line stages. I live in Australia. Does anyone know of any local or international (who will freight anywhere) companies who might fit the bill.

Thanks for any help

  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2001, 03:56 AM   #7
fcel is offline fcel  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: LA County
I have a hard time finding one too.
The following response is from Clemence from one of the other forum titled "Balance Zen Volume Control". I hope this helps.

Hi fcel,

Below are a few dealers that sell Volume Pot.

Go through the first two to get an ideal of what is available. You might get a better price from the next two suppliers.

  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2002, 10:00 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
If you choose balanced mode, then there is an another way to volume control without using 4 gang pots.


"Any instrument when dropped will roll into the least accessible corner."
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2002, 11:29 AM   #9
ralf is offline ralf  Germany
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Default R15


my R15?s are at 84Ohms, but therefore the Irf`s are matched.


  Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2002, 05:54 PM   #10
The one and only
Nelson Pass's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
It's interesting that R15 does in fact vary the sound
quality. With Aleph P's, there was a consensus among
users that the 1 Kohm pot used in that spot sounded
best at about the 3 o'clock position, which corresponded
to about 200 ohms. With larger resistance values, the
measured distortion and noise was better, but people
didn't prefer that in this particular circuit.

I have a hypothesis that devices have an optimal
working range sonically, and that often you need to
"exercise" them in a larger signal range than is
otherwise necessary in order to get the best sound.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balanced zen line stage hcbonfim Pass Labs 17 4th June 2007 09:17 PM
Balanced Line Stage tonistefanovski Pass Labs 1 27th December 2005 09:25 AM
Balanced Zen v5 + balanced Zen line stage Adrie Pass Labs 0 30th May 2004 05:27 PM
Zen Balanced Line Stage Balanced vs Unbalanced macka Pass Labs 28 11th December 2002 06:18 AM
Balanced line stage lykkedk Pass Labs 1 5th December 2002 07:36 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2