|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
The one and only
|
There seems to be significant interest in possible ways of getting SuperSymmetric operation on a monolithic chip (see the Gainclone X thread in the Solid State forum), and there have been a lot of imaginative solutions put forward, which is really great, although I don't see any of them actually working as an X circuit.
(BTW, SuperSymmetry is a trademark of Pass Laboratories) I think perhaps it's time to pull something out of the bag and start a new thread, catering to this interest but with a little bit different direction. Herewith I would like to present a method of doing this with a pair of op amps (or a dual op amp if you like) of the "current feedback" variety. As you may know, current feedback op amps look like regular op amps except that the (-) input pin is low impedance. They are distinguished by exceptionally wide bandwidth and stable operation, mostly because the feedback network also functions as gain degeneration for the input stage. Below you (hopefully) see a diagram showing two such op amps interconnected. Each consists of a complementary pair of input followers (actually just buffers, and not conceptually significant) forming the (+) input which drive the actual complementary input devices, where the Emitters form the (-) input to the op amp. These devices in turn drive a pair of complementary output devices whose collectors form the output. Each of these op amps is a slightly simplified version of commercially available parts. Just go to National Semiconductor's web site and look for "current feedback" op amps. What will be unusual here is that we have joined the (-) inputs of the two op amps to form the SuperSymmetric connection between them. Each of the non-inverting (+) inputs operates at virtual ground by virtue of the feedback from the output of the opposite amplifier. This effectively makes the (+) inputs of the op amps behave as if they were (-) and vice versa. R1 = R3, R2 = R4, and the gain is set by R2/R1. The input impedance is R1 if driven from a single-ended source, or 2*R1 from a balanced source. Any undriven inputs should be grounded. R0 sets the open loop gain of the system, and can be adjusted upward for greater stability, or downward for more feedback. This is a good place for a potentiometer for those who like to explore these issues. The output, of course, is balanced, and best performance is obtained by using it balanced. The input can be operated balanced or not, but gives slightly better performance when driven by a balanced source. I haven't yet run across an example of a monolithic higher power op amp using current feedback on the market, but there is no reason that one would not exist. If you find one, it will probably make a dandy SuperSymmetric power amplifier, but until then we have to content ourselves with low power. Or build something discretely...... Happy Valentine's Day. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
This way if I redraw using op-amps...?
JH |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
se |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
By the way, it might also be worth mentioning that current mode opamps are also referred to as Norton amplifiers. se |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Quote:
JH |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
se |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The one and only
|
Actually, these aren't current mode inputs as such,
that is to say they aren't Nortons. (Frankly I hadn't considered whether Nortons would do the job or not: I imagine they could) I was referring to "current feedback" op amps, whose (+) input is high impedance. It's the (-) that's low. As such, they do not require a single ended supply. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Quote:
JH |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
se |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
As for resistor values, the ideal feedback resistor (R2 and R4 in your drawing) value is rather device dependent and should be determined by the information given in the datasheet of the particular device in question. There's a whole interrelationship between feedback resistor, power supply voltage, load impedance, and closed loop gain that make designing with these kinds of opamps a bit more complicated than your basic voltage feedback opamp. So I guess the first order of business would be to pick a readily available device to start with. se |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14470 seconds (73.63% PHP - 26.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |