Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th July 2007, 01:24 PM   #1
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
h_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
Default passive biamping any worth?

Dear folks,

as I feel the urgent need to build the beautiful F3 and some time later a clone of the X-series, I'm running into the "more amps than ears", err "more amps than needed" situation.

So I read biamplification. Sure, probably best thing is reduced intermodulation distortion when used with an active crossover, but I'm really not keen on fiddling with crossovers.

I like my speakers very much and feel fine with their crossovers.

Since these 2.5 way thingies offer dual binding posts that can be separated, I thought of passive biamping.

What do you guys think about that?

I found a lot on active biamping, but only subjective opinions about passives. Rod Elliott says it's a waste of money - would you all agree? Is it really that worse?

I thought of using the 10W F3 for mid-heights and the 100W+ X for the bass.

All the best, Hannes
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007, 04:22 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
IMHO-

There is great value in passive biamping.
You can use a PP amp for bass, and an Aleph for the mids and highs.....
If you build your own speakers, you can use a lower efficiency bass driver (plays deeper in a small box) with a higher gain amp to make up the difference in level.....

I am sure there are many more.

Mr Elliot has written many excellent and some very amusing articles. In fact, his ELF subwoofer project was sort of the basis for my sub.....But he only recently emerged from the Mosfet Haze to design what he believes to be a great sounding Mosfet amp.
There are many other varying points of view........

JJ
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007, 06:00 PM   #3
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Quote:
Originally posted by jupiterjune
But he only recently emerged from the Mosfet Haze to design what he believes to be a great sounding Mosfet amp.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 01:53 AM   #4
paulb is offline paulb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
I hope it's great sounding. I just bought the boards for it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 02:06 AM   #5
Blues is offline Blues  United States
Lightning In A Bottle
diyAudio Member
 
Blues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bremerton, WA
Quote:
Originally posted by jupiterjune
IMHO-

.....But he only recently emerged from the Mosfet Haze...

JJ

We should have known...he was under the influence when he designed the Death of Zen.
__________________
Quad Matched Toshiba 2SK1530/2SJ201 MOSFETs http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-...ml#post2086375
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 05:18 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: n/a
I love my DoZ !!!!!

... and an F3 is next on my list !!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 06:08 AM   #7
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Default Re: passive biamping any worth?

Quote:
Originally posted by h_a
Since these 2.5 way thingies offer dual binding posts that can be separated, I thought of passive biamping.

What do you guys think about that?

I found a lot on active biamping, but only subjective opinions about passives. Rod Elliott says it's a waste of money - would you all agree? Is it really that worse?
If you have a surfeit of amplifiers already, how can it be a waste
of money? I recommend a setup where you can trim the gain
of the high vs low amplifiers.



surfeit: your vocabulary word for the day.

useage: "He died of a surfeit of opinions" - John Le Carre
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 07:43 AM   #8
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
h_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
Naah, of course for me it's not a waste of money!

I stated Elliott since waste of money equals completely useless and that's what I want to know if it's really that worse.

Sure, everybody here has a surfeit of amps (thanks Nelson for a new word in my vocabulary ;-) and of course for all the nice amps!), probably except me since I just started getting addicted to DIY.

If space wasn't an issue

Nelson, how do you quint amp your fullranges? Sure one amp or two for your big boom boxes, another one for your Kleinhorns and then?

All the best, Hannes
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 07:47 AM   #9
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
h_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
Oh and I forgot: thanks for the hint about the different gains! Only me could overlook that.

Well, there will be certainly some solution for this. Plenty of time until I get both amps up and running.

Cheers, Hannes
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 09:53 PM   #10
Ren is offline Ren  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Hannes,

My experience with passive bi-amping isn't real DIY but it is real-world.

I recently bought a Proceed AMP2 (150 wpc) on Audiogon to complement the AMP2 I already owned for 6 years or so. I passively bi-amped my speakers, hoping that the gain of two production examples of a single model would be very close.

I was expecting to hear more dynamics and perhaps a little more solid bass. I was wrong.

What I got was:

much improved left-to-right imaging (on well recorded albums the vocalists is now solidly in the center between the speakers; instruments are locked into place between the speakers)

more mid-range clarity (especially noticed on female vocals)

greater sense of the timing of musical notes (more silence between the notes)

I don't know whether this experience can be generalized. Would different amp designs show the same benefit? Would different speaker cross-over designs affect the result? Don't know.

But I was very impressed with this experiment.

Now if I could find time to actually build the 4 Aleph-X monoblocks I have boards for...

BR,

Ren
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
biamping and crossovers Zorac Multi-Way 16 22nd December 2008 02:57 AM
biamping question(s) big314mp Multi-Way 11 29th August 2008 08:35 PM
TDA1541 , passive i/v , AD797 for gain ; worth trying?? homemade Digital Line Level 9 8th January 2008 07:03 PM
Passive crossover before amplifier - biamping thevoice Multi-Way 1 7th July 2007 06:04 PM
Zen-biamping ijomojo Pass Labs 2 28th July 2005 08:01 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Page generated in 0.10629 seconds (84.02% PHP - 15.98% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio