|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dear folks,
as I feel the urgent need to build the beautiful F3 and some time later a clone of the X-series, I'm running into the "more amps than ears", err "more amps than needed" situation. So I read biamplification. Sure, probably best thing is reduced intermodulation distortion when used with an active crossover, but I'm really not keen on fiddling with crossovers. I like my speakers very much and feel fine with their crossovers. Since these 2.5 way thingies offer dual binding posts that can be separated, I thought of passive biamping. What do you guys think about that? I found a lot on active biamping, but only subjective opinions about passives. Rod Elliott says it's a waste of money - would you all agree? Is it really that worse? I thought of using the 10W F3 for mid-heights and the 100W+ X for the bass. All the best, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
IMHO-
There is great value in passive biamping. You can use a PP amp for bass, and an Aleph for the mids and highs..... If you build your own speakers, you can use a lower efficiency bass driver (plays deeper in a small box) with a higher gain amp to make up the difference in level..... I am sure there are many more. Mr Elliot has written many excellent and some very amusing articles. In fact, his ELF subwoofer project was sort of the basis for my sub.....But he only recently emerged from the Mosfet Haze to design what he believes to be a great sounding Mosfet amp. There are many other varying points of view........ JJ |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
|
I hope it's great sounding. I just bought the boards for it.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Lightning In A Bottle
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
We should have known...he was under the influence when he designed the Death of Zen.
__________________
Quad Matched Toshiba 2SK1530/2SJ201 MOSFETs http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-...ml#post2086375
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: n/a
|
I love my DoZ !!!!!
... and an F3 is next on my list !!!! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
of money? I recommend a setup where you can trim the gain of the high vs low amplifiers. ![]() surfeit: your vocabulary word for the day. useage: "He died of a surfeit of opinions" - John Le Carre |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Naah, of course for me it's not a waste of money!
I stated Elliott since waste of money equals completely useless and that's what I want to know if it's really that worse. Sure, everybody here has a surfeit of amps (thanks Nelson for a new word in my vocabulary ;-) and of course for all the nice amps!), probably except me since I just started getting addicted to DIY. If space wasn't an issue Nelson, how do you quint amp your fullranges? Sure one amp or two for your big boom boxes, another one for your Kleinhorns and then? All the best, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Oh and I forgot: thanks for the hint about the different gains! Only me could overlook that.
Well, there will be certainly some solution for this. Plenty of time until I get both amps up and running. Cheers, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Hannes,
My experience with passive bi-amping isn't real DIY but it is real-world. I recently bought a Proceed AMP2 (150 wpc) on Audiogon to complement the AMP2 I already owned for 6 years or so. I passively bi-amped my speakers, hoping that the gain of two production examples of a single model would be very close. I was expecting to hear more dynamics and perhaps a little more solid bass. I was wrong. What I got was: I don't know whether this experience can be generalized. Would different amp designs show the same benefit? Would different speaker cross-over designs affect the result? Don't know. But I was very impressed with this experiment. Now if I could find time to actually build the 4 Aleph-X monoblocks I have boards for... BR, Ren |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| biamping and crossovers | Zorac | Multi-Way | 16 | 22nd December 2008 02:57 AM |
| biamping question(s) | big314mp | Multi-Way | 11 | 29th August 2008 08:35 PM |
| TDA1541 , passive i/v , AD797 for gain ; worth trying?? | homemade | Digital Line Level | 9 | 8th January 2008 07:03 PM |
| Passive crossover before amplifier - biamping | thevoice | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th July 2007 06:04 PM |
| Zen-biamping | ijomojo | Pass Labs | 2 | 28th July 2005 08:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10629 seconds (84.02% PHP - 15.98% MySQL) with 10 queries |