|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
|
I have searched the forums and I got bits on info (not a lot of thread in regards to matching mosfet/transistors in the aleph preamp) the but wasn't sure if they are correct (and I need some to verify what was written). I also looked at passdiy and all I can see is the pearl phono preamp article.
In this thread: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...ht=#post26680, ignatz talked about close matching of the 2 signal IRF610. So only those 2 IRF610 needs matching? If yes, could you tell me which are the signal IRF610? how about the IRF9610? do these need to be matched at all? In the same thread, Mr. Pass has said that the transistor doesn't need to be matched. I assume he is talking about the ZTX devices? Thank you very much for the help |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Q16 and Q19 (the ones that the signal goes into and out of) are the ones to match. All the rest either don't matter or are self-adjusting.
(And no, this one isn't self-evident unless you've built stuff like this before, so I ain't fussin') Carry on. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
|
thank you very much
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Given the design of the circuit--meaning the resistance between the two halves (R51, R66, and a pot which doesn't seem to have any designation)--you do not technically have to match those two devices. However, the lower the resistance between the two halves (meaning the pot approaching zero), the more difference it will make. Given that each side has a dedicated current source and is cap-coupled at the output, there's a lot of leeway for mismatched devices.
You'll get somewhat better performance if they're matched. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
|
Quote:
I hope the question is clear. Thank you very much |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aleph P1.7 PCB with matched FET for sale | hc167 | Swap Meet | 7 | 28th January 2009 03:47 PM |
| WTB: Matched mosfet for the Aleph 1.2 | folkeb | Swap Meet | 1 | 27th January 2006 04:00 PM |
| Aleph 2 MATCHED Fet's FS | Mattyo5 | Swap Meet | 7 | 13th July 2004 05:06 PM |
| matched irfp240 aleph 2 | MikeZ | Pass Labs | 0 | 17th January 2003 08:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08496 seconds (74.56% PHP - 25.44% MySQL) with 10 queries |