Measuring sound quality - can it be done ??? - Page 5 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st January 2003, 02:39 PM   #41
diyAudio Member
mrfeedback's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default On Reflection......

"An interesting commentary, but I remain sceptical. I want to
hear the loudspeaker that results from this thinking"

I agree that his aperiodic approach seems like a good and reasonable argument, and yes I would like to hear them too.
His LF extension claims are interesting, and merit listening tests.

Anyway, this thread is entitled "Measuring sound reproduction quality - can it be done ??? ", and on recent reflection, I would say mostly yes, if the measure is enjoyment factor, and also that quality ought to be resonably measurable given appropriate weighting to the appropriate variables in a typical replay systems.

Noise, THD and IMD, phase behavior, load dependence and stability, spectral behaviour and frequency response are a set of variables that ought to reasonably describe any amplifier, and give some categorisation, but there still ends up being a sound factor that is not explained by typical theory and measurements.

In my experience, I have heard all sorts of live, recording and replay systems, and all sorts of amplifiers, cd players, speakers, desks, ob gear, tuners - you name it and they all have individual particular sonic characteristics, according to the circuit and constructional techniques used.

It ends up to the reviewer or consumer to categorise these additional factors, and form a longer term view and opinion, and it is this 'livability/home enjoyment factor" that makes or breaks a system.

Of course, a system is made up of individulal stages (parts), and how these interact is another mission critical factor, and this is immeasurable in normal testing measurements.
In my experience and opinion IMD is mostly the dominant 'good music vibe' damaging factor, but when this is removed, the music may require some harmonic distortion to add back the 'feel good factor'.

Clinical, but pleasant and nice reproduction reveals master tapes in naked form, and fun nuances added in mixdown production become evident, close mic'd sounds appear placed within a curtain between the speakers, and more distant recorded sounds can 'appear' behind the speaker cabinets or right in front of your forehead, and further sounds coming from way out past left and right, but this is still not the final arbiter.

Groovy and dancing sounding replay gear in your home makes for a happy living environment, but perhaps sadly, this factor is not particulaly precisely measurable.

Measurements will never replace subjective opinions, and although when implemented correctly, objective measurements may go close, but will never be able to replace the ultimate subjective long term listening and living experience.


PS - See the 'Sound Of Chassis Thread'
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2003, 03:24 PM   #42
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA
I guess you could say that when we listen carefully we are

The mind does not trust it, but the other aspects of our being
are quite happy with it.

Crack a cold one, listen, enjoy.

Even tweaking is because we enjoy it. All these types of things are
somehow emotionally charged, or we would'nt do it.
It then becomes a question of where the valuation is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2003, 04:24 PM   #43
diyAudio Member
mrfeedback's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default Yup.


I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? KT Class D 3 4th June 2014 12:02 AM
Best possible sound quality from +12 ATX PSU Arnop Chip Amps 3 6th April 2009 11:40 AM
Experience on measuring sound cad transfer function? NIC1138 Digital Source 1 7th June 2007 02:09 AM
Better Sound Quality LqDFx Car Audio 14 16th June 2006 04:49 PM
Sound quality,which is best? Richard.C Chip Amps 10 23rd August 2004 07:58 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2