|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: genova
|
hi,
for match mosfet is better use the source current that is in real life. Than, is correct testing input mosfet with 12mA and power mosfet with 670 mA? giorgio |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
yes,
William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Since the input fets are biased with 10mA and the output mosfets with about 500mA I would say that your ordinary matching at 12mA and 670mA is perfectly fine.
Matching even closer to the real circuit values won't bring substantial benefit, but of course would be ideal. Cheers, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets F5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
> Matching even closer to the real circuit values won't bring substantial benefit, but of course would be ideal.
I dare to disagree. The fact that 2 transistors have the same Vgs at one current does not guarantee they are identical in their Vgs vs Id characteristics. If you measure enough over full range, you would know what I mean. Also the thermal sensitivity does vary (i.e. room temperature match does not guarantee match at working temperature.) Would the amp work ? Yes. But it would not have the minimal distortion that a full-range match under working conditions would give you. Just my 2 cents, Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
Hi,
as far as I understood the 12mA and 670mA are the real circuit values. William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
from the same lot code as well - they tend to be more identical given the matched Vgs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
I agree; but this applies more to the IRF parts than other MOSFETs, e.g. Toshiba (both MOSFETs and JFETs).
Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Formerly "jh6you". R.I.P.
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
Okay . . . which Power MOSFETs of Toshiba are best useful? Meanwhile, I liked Hitachi 2SK135 and 2SJ50 times ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
I use 2SK1529 to replace IRFP240, but you need to change something to suit the lower Vgs. There is also a complememnntary part 2SJ200.
Similarly, 2SK1530/2SJ201 can replace IRFP250/9250 with adaptation. Then there are 2SK2013/2SJ148 which are similar to IRF610/9610, again with adaptation. The list is endless ...... Patrick |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: genova
|
Quote:
Hannes say that correct values are 10 mA and 500mA. It's ok? giorgio |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Matching MOSFET's for Aleph 2 | Thago | Pass Labs | 4 | 5th June 2007 08:05 PM |
| MOSFET Pool for Matching Qs (Aleph X or Other)? | lgreen | Pass Labs | 9 | 16th December 2004 03:25 AM |
| Aleph 5 (Mosfet matching time) | billy | Pass Labs | 3 | 18th January 2003 03:32 PM |
| Aleph 5 (Mosfet Matching) | billy | Pass Labs | 3 | 17th January 2003 03:18 PM |
| Matching MOSFET for Zen V4/Aleph 5 ??? | PsykoK | Pass Labs | 5 | 26th September 2002 10:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10519 seconds (74.74% PHP - 25.26% MySQL) with 10 queries |