|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: earth
|
I am replacing a few caps, on the output stage of a line amplifier.
It has non polarized caps., I have some suitable sized polarized ones, can I drop them in here, I am sure I have seen amps with coupling with polarized, and does the orientation matter? thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
Interconnect...join the positive and you will have a unt that will work fine in that position. 2 capacitors to replace one...it is ugly but i am using those last 46 years and had no problem. There are people that say that do not works....wrong!...i am using those last 46 years..for sure it works...even not making any sense. regards, Carlos
__________________
Try to build an amplifier folks ... it is pure adrenaline! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avalon Island
|
Two caps in series + to + makes non-polar
It also tends to cancel internal distortions. Use double (or more) the capacitance and the highest voltage available for lowest distortion |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: oosterhout
|
Interesting to try...
Two caps in series you connect the + and + with each other But why not the - and - . Or does it then not work as a non polar ? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
It doesn't matter if you connect them at the positive ends or at the negative ends. Both ways work.
Edit: Maybe somebody has a reason why one of the alternatives should be preferred, but technically both variants do the job. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
electrolytics are usually considered as poor quality substitutes. Why do you want to fit them in lieu of non polar?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Non polarised are electrolitic and often of high value (>10uF).
If you don't found them, you need to replace them with self-made non-polarised Regards |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
Ltcdr has not said he wants to replace non polar electrolytics with polar electrolytics. He is referring to a Quote:
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern Va.
|
maybe a little off topic, but has anyone ever tried charge coupling the series pair of electrolytics in an amplifier, such as in the feedback DC blocking position? JBL uses charge coupling of series resistors in their top-of-the-line speakers. They use this for film caps. I was wondering if it could be applied to series electrolytics, with due consideration for the voltage rating of the electrolytics.
"It is referred to as "Charge-Coupled Linear Definition Dividing Network". It utilized a biasing voltage in the crossover network to keep the music signal from crossing the dielectric zero-point of the capacitors. The result is more linear operation of the network with a significant improvement in sonic performance." "The Charge-Coupled crossover network includes a bias battery that supplies constant DC bias to the capacitor, so that the network is always "charged", and avoids generating distortion while switching between the on and off states." The positive of nine volt battery is connected through a 2megohm resistor to the junction point of the series caps. The negative is connected to ground. In a feedback network, 9 volts may be too much, depending on the voltage rating of the electrolytics. The charge is said to provide a bias to "squeeze" the dielectric to reduce microphonics, and also to prevent voltage reversals in the dielectric so that the cap's DA doesn't come in to play as much. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
|
What's the difference?
Polarized caps use tanatalum/niobium/aluminum foil for the plates and an anodically produced oxide layer for the dielectric. This oxide layer is produced by electrochemical means, applying an ever increasing voltage to the foil surface to a predetermined level to build up the oxide. This is produced by making the foil an anode (+) in an electrochemical circuit. maybe polarized to 40/50/60 volts until little current flows. Non polarized caps use some sort of conductive foil with a plastic insulating film as the dielectric. Why the distinction? In an electrical circuit, polarized caps rely on a constant (+) polarity on the anodized side of the cap to maintain the integrity of the dielectric. If one were to imposed a negative (-) current at sufficient voltage to this coating, it will start to de-oxidize and ultimately fail. I'm not sure what a continuos ac signal will do to an electrolytic over time, but I suppose it depends on the electrolyte, applied voltage, and construction material. I've used back to back eletrolytics in xovers, etc... and while they seem to work, I'd operate them well below they're rated voltage and not expect a loonngg lifespan. Of course, ymmv. John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing electroytics in signal path with non-polarised - which type of caps to use? | jpcoetzee | Solid State | 13 | 15th May 2008 01:12 PM |
| MTX 5 ch pot replacement | pk386 | Parts | 2 | 1st October 2006 04:32 AM |
| Polarised SMD Caps? | Lostcause | Parts | 10 | 23rd March 2006 07:28 PM |
| replacement cap for T-amp: How big? | MEXXX | Class D | 5 | 10th December 2004 12:30 PM |
| Doubt on plarised cap vs non polarised | rs1026 | Chip Amps | 4 | 17th September 2004 06:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10440 seconds (88.77% PHP - 11.23% MySQL) with 10 queries |