|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
There might be very few that have any expierence with these chips, but if you do, I would love to hear what you think, and of course any other chip you might want to throw in as well.
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, UK
|
Quote:
Both are quite good (and LM4562 is developing a cult) but having tried both I find LM6172, AD826, AD8620 better for duals... in that order. AD8066 experience based on 2xAD8065 on brown dog adaptors and AD8620 based on 2xAD8610. AD8065x2 was smooth but a bit boring, lacking bass dynamics. LM4562 was very clean but rather dry and uninvolving. All of this was in the LPF of a CD player. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
|
Quote:
Can you elaborate more on the comparisons? What setup do you use?
__________________
CT |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden--> Here
|
Quote:
Just ripped some out of my soundcard,and mounted some LM4562 instead. Havent had the time to listen yet.
__________________
Regards Åke |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, UK
|
Quote:
This was in the analogue stage of a Marantz CD-67SE. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
My 8066's haven't burnt in yet, but I'm loving them.
My impressions: 4562 - very nice sounding and adequate detail, but not outstanding. There's nothing wrong with them, however they don't stand out as exceptional either. 8620 - nice forward sound, all tonal frequencies are represented with lushness and aggresion, but many details are lacking - I know this b/c many reference tracks I use have entire sections deleted from representation. Not for audiophile use IMO. 8066 - prior to adequate settling time (1 hour's impression): superb accuracy and dynamics, tonally accurate (however a bit bassy - that's likely to settle down with 'age' IME), very high resolution, decent spaciousness to sound, excellent imaging for an op-amp. Impressive level of detail so far. I can see how some would see this as boring - the sound can be dry if the source material and delivery machine is less than stellar (e.g. standard ipod headphone out, mp3 files, most sound cards). My suggestion: try these in an amplification section of an amplifier after a good quality DAC; mix them with some nice quailty caps and resistors, you'll never turn back! |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
__________________
less is more |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
|
I am using an AD8066 in the O/P stage of a Musical Fidelity
X-DAC V3, preceded by OPA2134s, instead of the original all NE5532s.I have fitted 78L12/79L12 regulators close to the AD8066, and replaced the manufacturer recommended 100nF ceramic bypass capacitors with normal 100nF 63V types. This takes a slight hardness off high treble. I am also using an AD8066 in a headphone amplifier with a discrete buffer stage. I tried the LM4562 in a preamplifier instead of the original design's OPA2134. Ultimately, I found the huge amount of detail a little fatigueing, and reverted to the OPA2134. As a result of this, I replaced the generic 45xx device in my PCs Soundblaster X-FI Extreme Music with an OPA2134. This combinatio of OPA2134 , with AD8066 in the headphone amplifier is very good indeed . In both the X-DAC V3 and the Headphone amplifier, I get a fabulous 3D soundstage using the AD8066. SandyK |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: north west England
|
Hi,
I have a Musical fidelity B1 Mk2 (very close to the tempest model) Just replaced my TL072CP with a 4562 and I noticed a great improvement in detail and space. There is an increase in very high frequencies which affect hihats... I would say 12khz and above creating a more delicate sound. I also have improved bass. Sounds Great and not fatiguing to listen to and moderate volumes. Midrange is a touch clearer and "aligned" I also just bought an AD8066 and fitted this in the socket.... I am disappointed to be honest. The bass is increased a touch around 80hz but the bass "which gives the punch" is missing. Also strangely Sub kick drums sound flaccid and lacking in weight. The top end is more coloured and it sounds metallic - rather like titanium tweeters. The midrange is lacking lower mids and can sound a touch brash too. In the end I guess it may just be a mismatch for the MF B1 mk2 as I had heard such good reviews, which prompted me to buy one and mount it onto a dip8 socket! For now I am sticking with the 4562 for now - as it delivers... and delivers well! One thing though, When used on a Musical Fidelity MK1 (which I also own) the 4562 detail can be a little harsh and fatiguing. Its revealing listen and can really delight but after a while I want something a little smoother. Jonathan |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Dear friends,
I would like to try AD8066, I need 4 pieces for my CD player Denon 2560, but have no where to get them in Serbia. Can someone help? Dragoljub Pejčev Balkan 40 18320 Dimitrovgrad Serbia |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AD8620 vs. AD8066 | Crazy_D | Digital Source | 10 | 30th August 2012 01:11 PM |
| Ad8066 | lduarte1973 | Chip Amps | 2 | 13th March 2009 09:10 PM |
| Problem using a pair of AD8066 at I/V stage | Noak | Digital Source | 6 | 30th July 2008 06:58 AM |
| Ad8066 | Tuur | Parts | 0 | 13th August 2004 04:41 PM |
| Sony NS900 OPA2134 or AD8066? | Drioannis | Chip Amps | 14 | 3rd August 2004 08:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |