|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
i plan on building rod elliots 4th order LR active crossover. What high quality opamp shold i use in the output buffer? What should i use to change the gain?
schematic and inf o here http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Do a search, there are many threads with people expressing opinions on their favorite crossovers.
To add gain, you could reconfigure the input stage to have gain. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
|
Analog Devices just released a very interesting book (in pdf format). My sub title would be "everything you ever wanted to know about op-amps ... and then some." ... lots of filter circuits and op-amp recommendations, etc.
I got it by subscribing to their new letters re: op-amps ... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: close to Basel
|
Hi,
I recommend FET-type OPs. Since in filter circuits almost always high impedance values exist, FET-types are imo better to couple out the signal. There are many useful types starting from BB´s OPA604/2604, 132/2132, 134/2134/4134 to AnalogDevices AD711/712, 8510/8512, 8610/8620. Using double and Quad-OPs reduces stray effects and keeps the layout compact. With the suggested OPs sound is rather more a function of proper layout, grounding and power supply than anything else. As an output buffer with gain, I suggest something like in Fig.3c of the BB OPA604 datasheet. This circuit shows more flexibility and clearly better results in driving capacitive loads than just a simple resistor at the output. With this circuit You can tune in on Your´re load situation. Giving best possible signal behaviour (best rectangular wave). The influence of cabling is minimized vastly and You can use even very highly capacitive and/or very long cables. For critical loads like very long cables You should use a OP thats capable of delivering some mA at the output, or use a additional Buffer like the BB BUF634 or an dicrete Buffer circuit. jauuu Calvin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
look up WaltJung's site. He describes (in detail) cascading two opamps to create a composite that has excellent input and precision characteristics of a single opamp combined with the output capability of a true IC buffer for driving any sensible cable & load. He also has a comprehensive article there, for building a high quality discrete buffer. This would replace the buffer in the composite or could be used on it's own if all you need is impedance conversion and no voltage gain. If you don't fancy implementing these, at least read the articles for the knowledge and then ask the informed question that you aren't aware of at the moment.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Berlin
|
Quote:
Hello! Does anyone have a link? AD site has loads of information, but can become a bit confusing... Greetings, Nils |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
My short answer is 5532. I use 'em.
I do think there is some advantage to using FET types where there is expectation that there is EMI. FETs have less opportunity to demodulate RF, and thus cause interference problems . By the time any audio signal get to the user, it's alredy been through 100 5532s in the recording process. Doug |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden--> Here
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards Åke |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
|
LT1469 = Yes ... http://www.linear.com/pc/productDeta...09,C1022,P1845
( LT1604 = No, don't bother with 16 bit A to D.) |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
While were talking about active filters what is are good passbands and stopbands for a two way crossover?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low-cost active crossover module for Hypex UcD amps | Al Garay | Class D | 1 | 12th December 2010 02:26 AM |
| Amps for active crossover setup | jamikl | Multi-Way | 8 | 16th February 2009 10:13 AM |
| Active crossover guys.....what amps do you use? | demon2091tb | Multi-Way | 58 | 28th November 2006 06:22 PM |
| using passive crossover before amps to active biamp? | cowanrg | Multi-Way | 7 | 29th October 2004 01:45 AM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10778 seconds (79.68% PHP - 20.32% MySQL) with 10 queries |