|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In term of sound,are there noticeable differences???
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rijckholt
|
All music you'l play has been recorded using microphone-cable.
Microphone-cable is balanced, coax-cable is unbalanced. Nearly all Hifi equipment uses unbalanced connections. So you probably need coax. If you have microphone-cable laying around and want to use it, just connect one of the two inner-conductors to ground or, use one inner for signal, the other for ground-connection and connect the shield only at the one side that connects to the output. Soundquality and noise are due to cable-quality, not balanced or unbalanced. Balanced connections are useful at long distances, (electro- magnetic) noisy enviroments and complex installations. Andre |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I was under the impression, when I was young and stupid ( well I'm no longer young) that using screened twin core would solve all the interference/hum problems that come with unbalanced cable. I was wrong then and the same still applies. The source and receiver must be designed to make best use of the twin core (mic) cable. Psuedo balanced can improve rejection but takes a lot of effort and measuring to extract that small improvement (judging by the reading I have done). WJung & DSelf and others tackle this field well. Rane and Jensen are also worth consulting. Capacitance and inductance affect the terminations. I believe that much of the sound quality claims are down to "balancing" the requirements of the terminations and thus minimise compromises by using various C & L to tailor the sound.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
As said you will probably need to use coax.
Quote:
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
my choice of word using "terminations" when I was referring the the source and receiver has caused confusion. Sorry. I am talking about the effect of extra cable capacitance on the output of a source and the other three combinations of C & L & receive.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone using microphone cable in making their phono cable? | rich121 | Analog Line Level | 8 | 10th September 2010 12:50 AM |
| coaxial loudspeaker cable ??? | montana | Multi-Way | 1 | 11th April 2008 03:44 PM |
| Coaxial Cable Capacitance | -_nando-_ | Parts | 2 | 17th March 2007 04:13 PM |
| diy coaxial audio cable | rnzr | Digital Source | 30 | 4th February 2005 10:23 PM |
| DIY COAXIAL Cable besides Belden? | NEAR_SOTA | Everything Else | 24 | 12th August 2003 08:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08094 seconds (76.74% PHP - 23.26% MySQL) with 11 queries |