Energy Loss - Page 10

kvholio · 9th September 2006, 06:12 PM

afaik you're right, but It's the TIME that gives me a headache, Poobah.
What happens to time when objects travel at infinite speed ?
btw, am i still making sense

With kind regards,

Klaas

poobah · 9th September 2006, 06:13 PM

uh... time stops when you hit the speed of light?

kvholio · 9th September 2006, 06:19 PM

When you exceed the speed of light the clock starts ticking backwards right ?
(btw, i must be a masochist for gettin into this

)

Klaas

poobah · 9th September 2006, 06:22 PM

hmmmm... I don't know... my understanding stops just before the speed of light.

kvholio · 9th September 2006, 06:35 PM

LOL mine too Poobah.
my point is perhaps, that most people in this thread try to calculate from a real-world perspective, a situation that is "out of this world".
I tried to walk backwards from the situation that was given (didnt get far sofar

)

Klaas

poobah · 9th September 2006, 06:44 PM

Yep...

If you conserve charge, then you violate energy. If you conserve enegry, then you violate charge.

I think you must have R or L...

Choco was talking about L'Hopital... wonder if he has some math for us to try and remember?

Every equation I know falls apart with "divide by zero" issues.

kvholio · 9th September 2006, 07:04 PM

I've got two fr*ggin' wikipedia open, one with Einsteins theory of relativity, the other with the rule of L'Hopital.
the L'hopital rule.....well goes way beyond my understanding of maths (hated calculus back in school)

By the time i would understand it and know how to implement it, it would be 2046

Nevertheless curious about how this turns out.
i need a beer after this one

(think i'll take a Heineken)

With kind regards,

Klaas

poobah · 9th September 2006, 07:08 PM

2046...

Let's see if Choco can show us some L'Hopital...

Giaime,

What's your opinion here?

anatech · 9th September 2006, 07:14 PM

Relativity requires adjustment. Since everything is based on time, an infinetly small slice tending towards zero blows up everything.

It could be the universe's way of saying, not possible. I refuse to get a headache trying to think on this one. BTW, the plane takes off!

-Chris

poobah · 9th September 2006, 07:16 PM

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NFB net gain or loss	rick57	Tubes / Valves	18	10th June 2005 11:26 AM
tragic loss of mdf...	nerd of nerds	Multi-Way	11	26th February 2005 02:08 AM
NEED HELP NOW! reg. loss in induktor.	TroelsM	Class D	2	6th January 2005 12:20 PM
At a loss...	cunningham	Class D	21	23rd September 2004 07:29 AM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

9th September 2006, 06:12 PM	#91
kvholio diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: leeuwarden	afaik you're right, but It's the TIME that gives me a headache, Poobah. What happens to time when objects travel at infinite speed ? btw, am i still making sense With kind regards, Klaas

9th September 2006, 06:13 PM	#92
poobah diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2005	uh... time stops when you hit the speed of light?

9th September 2006, 06:19 PM	#93
kvholio diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: leeuwarden	When you exceed the speed of light the clock starts ticking backwards right ? (btw, i must be a masochist for gettin into this ) Klaas

9th September 2006, 06:22 PM	#94
poobah diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2005	hmmmm... I don't know... my understanding stops just before the speed of light.

9th September 2006, 06:35 PM	#95
kvholio diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: leeuwarden	LOL mine too Poobah. my point is perhaps, that most people in this thread try to calculate from a real-world perspective, a situation that is "out of this world". I tried to walk backwards from the situation that was given (didnt get far sofar ) Klaas

9th September 2006, 06:44 PM	#96
poobah diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2005	Yep... If you conserve charge, then you violate energy. If you conserve enegry, then you violate charge. I think you must have R or L... Choco was talking about L'Hopital... wonder if he has some math for us to try and remember? Every equation I know falls apart with "divide by zero" issues.

9th September 2006, 07:04 PM	#97
kvholio diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: leeuwarden	I've got two fr*ggin' wikipedia open, one with Einsteins theory of relativity, the other with the rule of L'Hopital. the L'hopital rule.....well goes way beyond my understanding of maths (hated calculus back in school) By the time i would understand it and know how to implement it, it would be 2046 Nevertheless curious about how this turns out. i need a beer after this one (think i'll take a Heineken) With kind regards, Klaas

9th September 2006, 07:08 PM	#98
poobah diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2005	2046... Let's see if Choco can show us some L'Hopital... Giaime, What's your opinion here?

9th September 2006, 07:14 PM	#99
anatech diyAudio Moderator Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Georgetown, On	Relativity requires adjustment. Since everything is based on time, an infinetly small slice tending towards zero blows up everything. It could be the universe's way of saying, not possible. I refuse to get a headache trying to think on this one. BTW, the plane takes off! -Chris

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

9th September 2006, 07:16 PM	#100
poobah diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2005