|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm designing an active filter for quite an high-end system and need some advice concerning the op-amps to use : there will be 4 opamps in series for the midrange driver !
I plan to use some AD797 but they are really really expensive so I won't use them everywhere. I have found some very contradictory information about the old NE5534 and NE5532 : http://fnt-www.ss.titech.ac.jp/~haji...rtion/opa.html -106dB for NE5532 and -114dB THD for NE5534 (-134dB for AD797 !) This looks respectable for 0.30$ opamps http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampins/webbop/5532.htm 0.002% ?! But that's huge for an opamp ! And finally : http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ne5534a.pdf 0.002%, but this time a big increase in THD above 2kHz ! Who should I believe ? Also, are there any other more important parameters to look at (such as suggested here : http://www.octave-electronics.com/lcaudio/ad825.shtml ), like slew rate (which is always theorically sufficient) or something else ? Considering more recent and not too expensive opamps, I was considering the OPA2134 which has low distorsion under 10kHz. Is it worth its price ? (10 times the price of a 5534 though !) I'd be glad if someone could help because I'm really lost ! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Paris
|
Hello youyoung,
I'm no expert but I read forums a lot and I've often seen people being disappointing when replacing NE5532 opamps by more modern and expensive models. I think it has a very strong reputation and should not be overlooked. Bye |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
|
hi,
let me share little bit experience, during I test in my dac ( 151a with digital filer & reclock, & I try different Op-amp in the LPF. if lower price acutally I will choose Philips 5534. 5532 not good. TI5532 & NE5532 forget it. ths is my opinions. pls considerate choose philips 5534. expensive than NE & other brands, but really in this price range better. thx thomas |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
my Boonton THD analyzer uses the NE5532's -- fwiw -- Cyril Bateman also used the NE5534 (along with AD797) in his ULD oscillator -- it's what we refer to as a "high class" problem when you have so many great chips to select from.
jack |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
|
FWIW, I have two active XO systems using NE5532s (Fairchild, IIRC) - 6 op amps (1/2 NE5532) in the tweeter line, 7 in the mids and 4 per woofer. I am very happy with the sound of both. They responded very nicely to a good power supply that replaced 7815s.
I bought a bunch to prove out the concept of active XOs to myself, without spending a lot. I haven't been tempted enough to replace them - they are soldered into the circuit without sockets. I have a system or two in the works that will use OPA2134s, so we'll see about those. They will be socketed, so I can swap if I think I need to. I hope not, since I bought 200 recently. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Walt Jung has made rather many distortion measurements in his book "Opamp applications" and in the chapter about audio, chapter 6.
http://www.analog.com/library/analog...h6_final_I.pdf http://www.analog.com/library/analog..._handbook.html
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Norway
|
I would say the OPA2134 is definately worth its price
__________________
Mads K |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Netherlands
|
opa227 anyone .... performs a bit beter than 5534 in my lab
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
Yes, and the OPA2227; very good op-amps
__________________
Mads K |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thx everyone for your answers !
The OPA2227/227 are not available for me so if I choose one of the TI models, I'd rather use the OPA2134 (though is has higher THD) They seem to be quite load-dependant though, so not very suitable for buffering or so. But before "investing" I must know if new opamps compare really better at low gains (1~4) with the 553x : Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Oh BTW what do you think about those units : AD 825 and AD 8099 (in the tweeter filter section) ? |
|||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The NE5534....misunderstood? | TimA | Solid State | 102 | 8th December 2010 02:23 AM |
| NE5532 vs NE5534 | rumblinbass | Parts | 9 | 14th December 2007 02:24 PM |
| NE5534 Compensation Cap | EchoWars | Solid State | 17 | 3rd January 2006 11:46 PM |
| What is the purpose of NE5534 in this amp | Gasho | Solid State | 12 | 11th April 2005 12:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12279 seconds (80.40% PHP - 19.60% MySQL) with 11 queries |