|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North of Toronto
|
Russ I can see where this could/might apply to more than 2 channel stereo
say 5, 6 or 7 would iit be possible/feasible to incorporate a sort of preset to each channel? i.e. boost or attenuate each channel independently of overall loudness?. This would ideally be done through software in your programamable modules. I realize this is an order of magnitude leap ahead of what you just proposed.
__________________
Sheldon D |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North of Toronto
|
Yes,
essentially what i asked about is a balance function across channels not jsut stereo.
__________________
Sheldon D |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
|
Excellent approach Russ, I like the idea of a simple attenuator.
I would suggest too keep it as simple as possible as you have. As soon as you start adding functions and complexity to the circuit some of us (me included) will shy away from building it. I guess many on the forum are not digital inclined and have never programmed a PIC (me included once again). So what are the alternatives for those of us at the digital end? |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Official Court Jester
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Certainly, there are a host of things anyone so inclined could do with a controller in the firmware. I will explore some ideas later on in the thread and probably supply some code and layouts to help people out. ![]() Cheers! Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I am still in many ways just a beginner here, so having some little bit of success here really makes me feel great. ![]() As for the PIC programming I am going to be posting a layout for a simple serial port programmer I did which is based on the "RCD" PIC programmer. Very simple to use with open source free software. Once you have that and the HEX code all you need are the PICs to program. ![]() Alternatively, as Choky said Brian and I may well decide to sell some of these as kits. Have not made any hard fast decissions yet. Cheers! Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hey Russ - Looks good. Advantages over the Kooka - which by the way sounds absolutly transparent to my ears.
NUdge Nudge, Wink Wink * This almost seems like it could pretty easily be converted into a source selector - and extending it to include an LCD display shouldn't be to far off
__________________
Ross Saunders |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Crunchville, where I don't fit in.
|
Oh Russ, I knew you could do it! Nice work and an answer that a LOT of peeps are looking for.
Hmm, I wonder if my WILLEM programmer can program that pic thingy...it's not listed. but others like it are... Any idea? I've only used it for eproms to make ellicit DVD playerslater...
__________________
Crazy Yankee. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germany
|
The attenuator looks great.
The pads and holes though for the resistors look a bit small. Bigger pads are easier to solder. Will the pcbs be double sided with vias or single sided? It looks like single sided to me so maybe larger pads are a good idea. Using the DAC with the a normal pot is also a good idea because there is know need for a display. I also like the idea of a 7bit control because its more stable and not so many steps. 6 would also would be ok. The relays are very good. I think one could also use others but I am not so sure how universal they are. If the input selection is also so simple and good I will be surely using them. A mute Relay would be helpful to make a time delay on turn on etc. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F.S.: Joshua Tree - A Twisted Log Attenuator | Cobra2 | Swap Meet | 2 | 21st September 2010 12:23 AM |
| Yet another relay attenuator | jwb | Solid State | 34 | 21st July 2010 08:17 AM |
| Constant impedance relay-resistor logarithmic attenuator | x-pro | Pass Labs | 75 | 27th June 2005 12:12 PM |
| relay based attenuator | squadra | Solid State | 21 | 1st December 2004 11:10 PM |
| Ladder relay attenuator or so? | Eccu | Solid State | 0 | 6th October 2003 12:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10945 seconds (86.74% PHP - 13.26% MySQL) with 11 queries |