Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th January 2006, 09:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Default Volume pots: Why are low values better?

It is often claimed that volume pots should be of fairly low value, rather 10 k than 50 k (not considering law faking now). However, I can't remember ever reading a motivation for this claim. I can think of two reasons:

1) Noise:
Nothing to argue about there, in cases where the extra few dBs matter.

2) Avoiding unnecessary HF roll off due to cable capacitance and other stray capacitance:
Doesn't really require a low value pot since we could put a resistor in parallel with it to reduce input impedance. It may matter though in combination with input transistor capacitance.

So my question is, are these the reasons for the claim, or is there some other reason I have overlooked, or are high value pots usually of inferior quality for some reason?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:21 PM   #2
moamps is offline moamps  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
Default Re: Volume pots: Why are low values better?

Quote:
Originally posted by Christer
...Doesn't really require a low value pot since we could put a resistor in parallel with it to reduce input impedance....
Can you elaborate please?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:30 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Default Re: Re: Volume pots: Why are low values better?

Quote:
Originally posted by moamps


Can you elaborate please?
Well if I have a 50 k volume pot, the input impedance is 50 k. Connecting a resistor in parallel with the pot (between the ends, not the wiper), will make the pot appear as a lower resistance to the source.

Of course one could use a lower value pot for a start, but I can think of several reasons not to. One might already have a good 50 k pot at hand, or if investing in an expensive pot one might want to try it in different circuits, some of them requiring the higher value. One could also imagine a case where some sources demand a higher impedance. Then one could have a paralleling resistor on the other inputs, before the input selector, of course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:34 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cleveland ohio
years ago there was an article in Audio Amateur on a 2k stepped attenuator...which I acrually built and am using...

In that article is explained why you might want a lower ohm volume control. Can't remember the reasons at the moment...
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:41 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
2 k is extremely lowish. Of course there is nothing wrong at all with such a low impedance, if you know your source can handle it. However, many sources will most likely not like such low loads. Even if if they often have a series output resistor on the order of 1 k to protect them from short circuits, drive capability is probably bad in most cases, causing unnecessary distorsion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:41 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
jeff mai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
In a situation where the source impedance allows it, try a 600 ohm attenuator. Listen and you will immediately know a reason to prefer it over a 50Kohm attenuator.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:49 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by jeff mai
In a situation where the source impedance allows it, try a 600 ohm attenuator. Listen and you will immediately know a reason to prefer it over a 50Kohm attenuator.
Few sources can handle that out of the box, although one could redesign them, of course. I know our two Pavels use output buffers and 50 Ohm termination at the receivng end, and claim that to improve the sound, althought they have no explanation for why.

However, although listening impressions are interesting, I would like to know why, and it it is only under certain circumstances? However, one part of my question was also if it is only the input impedance per se that matters, or if higher value pots are inherently inferior for some reason?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 09:55 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Tube_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aveiro-Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by Christer
However, one part of my question was also if it is only the input impedance per se that matters, or if higher value pots are inherently inferior for some reason?
Hi Christer

For me is the output impedance of the pot that matters.

For ex. a 50 K pot have a worst case output impedance of 12.5K and a 10k pot only 2.5K...What a difference..
__________________
Jorge
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 10:01 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by Tube_Dude


Hi Christer

For me is the output impedance of the pot that matters.

For ex. a 50 K pot have a worst case output impedance of 12.5K and a 10k pot only 2.5K...What a difference..
Sure, I agree, but if that is a problem dependes on what comes after it. If noise is not a major concern and capacitances are not too big, then it need not be a problem. I am absolutely not suggesting that a high value pot should always work fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2006, 10:06 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Tube_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aveiro-Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by Christer


Sure, I agree, but if that is a problem dependes on what comes after it. If noise is not a major concern and capacitances are not too big, then it need not be a problem.
In that case I agree with you.
__________________
Jorge
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to ID volume & fader pots? jol50 Car Audio 54 18th January 2008 05:26 AM
volume pots for tube amp Miller-8 Parts 5 16th February 2007 04:29 PM
Best Volume Pots? A3rd.Zero Parts 18 2nd May 2004 04:00 PM
volume pot values fatmarley Solid State 2 11th December 2003 02:02 PM
Superfluous Volume pots on power/ amp Raymond Solid State 6 12th March 2003 12:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Page generated in 0.10705 seconds (80.60% PHP - 19.40% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio