|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
It is often claimed that volume pots should be of fairly low value, rather 10 k than 50 k (not considering law faking now). However, I can't remember ever reading a motivation for this claim. I can think of two reasons:
1) Noise: Nothing to argue about there, in cases where the extra few dBs matter. 2) Avoiding unnecessary HF roll off due to cable capacitance and other stray capacitance: Doesn't really require a low value pot since we could put a resistor in parallel with it to reduce input impedance. It may matter though in combination with input transistor capacitance. So my question is, are these the reasons for the claim, or is there some other reason I have overlooked, or are high value pots usually of inferior quality for some reason? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
Of course one could use a lower value pot for a start, but I can think of several reasons not to. One might already have a good 50 k pot at hand, or if investing in an expensive pot one might want to try it in different circuits, some of them requiring the higher value. One could also imagine a case where some sources demand a higher impedance. Then one could have a paralleling resistor on the other inputs, before the input selector, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cleveland ohio
|
years ago there was an article in Audio Amateur on a 2k stepped attenuator...which I acrually built and am using...
In that article is explained why you might want a lower ohm volume control. Can't remember the reasons at the moment... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
2 k is extremely lowish. Of course there is nothing wrong at all with such a low impedance, if you know your source can handle it. However, many sources will most likely not like such low loads. Even if if they often have a series output resistor on the order of 1 k to protect them from short circuits, drive capability is probably bad in most cases, causing unnecessary distorsion.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
|
In a situation where the source impedance allows it, try a 600 ohm attenuator. Listen and you will immediately know a reason to prefer it over a 50Kohm attenuator.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
However, although listening impressions are interesting, I would like to know why, and it it is only under certain circumstances? However, one part of my question was also if it is only the input impedance per se that matters, or if higher value pots are inherently inferior for some reason? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aveiro-Portugal
|
Quote:
For me is the output impedance of the pot that matters. For ex. a 50 K pot have a worst case output impedance of 12.5K and a 10k pot only 2.5K...What a difference..
__________________
Jorge |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aveiro-Portugal
|
Quote:
__________________
Jorge |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to ID volume & fader pots? | jol50 | Car Audio | 54 | 18th January 2008 05:26 AM |
| volume pots for tube amp | Miller-8 | Parts | 5 | 16th February 2007 04:29 PM |
| Best Volume Pots? | A3rd.Zero | Parts | 18 | 2nd May 2004 04:00 PM |
| volume pot values | fatmarley | Solid State | 2 | 11th December 2003 02:02 PM |
| Superfluous Volume pots on power/ amp | Raymond | Solid State | 6 | 12th March 2003 12:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10705 seconds (80.60% PHP - 19.40% MySQL) with 10 queries |