|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
Everyone raves about the Alps Blue Velvet, which you can pretty much only buy from one source in any given location for around $16. But, I've also heard some bad things about it's tracking and such. Other people rave about these $20-60 pots... but who wants to pay that kind of money?
I am wanting to build a passive preamp with a good pot in it. I've considered stepped attenuators, and really just don't want to build one. Plus, they're pricey as well. I've been looking for Bourns 82 series cermet pots, which seem to be fairly good on paper, but haven't been having any luck. Does anyone here know of a good stereo pot (or pair of mono pots) that would have good channel matching, excellent tracking, extremely low noise, great sound, and high reliability without breaking the bank? Let's try to keep this under $20. I am really hoping for something that can de-throne the Alps Blue (RK27). Thanks all |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
cermet pots are very difficult to build accurately enough to give good stereo tracking. But the sound is good. Plastic track pots are quite good sounding but in log law the tracking is again a bit loose. Laser trimming helps here and these are often the source of the "better audio pots". For good sound and impecable tracking then a stepped attenuator is the only way to go . They are bulky and expensive. The dual stepping version with only one pair of resistors on line at any time are reputed to be the best but are twice as expensive. Linear law pots are, by far, the more accurate of stereo trackers. You can convert these to a form of log law with a faking resistor. Choose a lin about 10times bigger than you want and add a faking resistor about 10% to 15% of the pot value from wiper to ground. Down side is a variable input impedance with wiper position but a low source impedance should not be troubled with this. Try a lin plastic with faking and tell us what you think. Some decades ago a British audio journalist did an article on passive attenuator with a cap across some part of it to control (improve) the high frequency pass ability and reported really good and consistent results. Try a search on passives and see if you can find some data.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
I was looking at offerings by Bourns- cermet and conductive plastic. Seems no one stocks the useful higher values. They also don't have any dual section ones. Mouser and Digikey can order them in large quantities, but it is a little pricey.
I am hoping to find a good linear pot that I could use the log faking with. I want something, though, that has the absolute best matching between channels. Since many dual section pots have poor channel matching, I thought that a pair of closely matched single pots would do better. I could use a few gears to use one know to control both pots. I guess by the time I spend all the time and money to find a good pot and implement it effectively, I could have just bought a few stepped attenuators...
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
Another option is 10-turn precision pots, such as Bourns 3540/3541
series and similar from Spectrol, etc. If you do a bit of work with Excel, you'll find that the bottom couple turns of the total available rotation provide a reasonable "law" for an audio attenuator. The remaining 8 turns of rotation only provide a bit more gain, but in most applications you never work with the volume control near the top portion of its rotation anyway. I've looked at log-faking using 10-turns and think it'll do more harm than good. These pots are available in ganged versions, though I am vitrually certain they're custom with large minimums. Richard Marsh used the Spectrol equivalents years ago and just had two separate single units. I would suppose he'd have used the little counter/index gizmos to set them the same.
__________________
bel |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Rapids MI
|
Panasonic offers some high quality pots through Digi-Key.
__________________
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you lay the blame. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denmark
|
http://www.hificollective.co.uk/comp...tiometers.html
They have different pots for sale, among other things... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
|
I have had very good results with the Bourns 53-series pots. I have a bjillion 300K linear mono ones that I use everywhere. PM your address to me and I'll mail a couple to you. The datasheet can be found here. The part number is 53AAAB28B40. The '40' at the end of the part number is the code for 300K -- a nonstandard value.
Cheers, -Casey Walsh |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
these threads are quite interesting and informative: In search of a perfect attenuator & 1st link Have you tried Farnell as a source for Bourns?
__________________
Gravity - Making the G since 13.7 billion B.C. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
|
You might want to check this out. Doesnt come with mounting hardware, but you can get that real cheap. I ordered 10 packs, and look what I got, one in each.
![]() ![]() Pretty good deal I would say. Only problem with that site is it might end up costing you more than $20 to get that pot, because they have so many neat things there that I end up spending far more than I intended to. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| So I did try all those different potentiometers | Peter Daniel | Chip Amps | 308 | 12th August 2009 02:29 PM |
| Potentiometers | BlairHatcher | Chip Amps | 22 | 9th February 2005 12:24 AM |
| Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? | KT | Class D | 0 | 14th November 2004 06:51 AM |
| Cheaper, good quality potentiometers | paulb | Solid State | 30 | 25th February 2004 02:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11666 seconds (78.64% PHP - 21.36% MySQL) with 10 queries |