Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th January 2006, 06:26 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Question Quality Potentiometers

Everyone raves about the Alps Blue Velvet, which you can pretty much only buy from one source in any given location for around $16. But, I've also heard some bad things about it's tracking and such. Other people rave about these $20-60 pots... but who wants to pay that kind of money?

I am wanting to build a passive preamp with a good pot in it. I've considered stepped attenuators, and really just don't want to build one. Plus, they're pricey as well. I've been looking for Bourns 82 series cermet pots, which seem to be fairly good on paper, but haven't been having any luck.

Does anyone here know of a good stereo pot (or pair of mono pots) that would have good channel matching, excellent tracking, extremely low noise, great sound, and high reliability without breaking the bank? Let's try to keep this under $20. I am really hoping for something that can de-throne the Alps Blue (RK27).

Thanks all
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th January 2006, 08:17 AM   #2
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
cermet pots are very difficult to build accurately enough to give good stereo tracking. But the sound is good.

Plastic track pots are quite good sounding but in log law the tracking is again a bit loose. Laser trimming helps here and these are often the source of the "better audio pots".

For good sound and impecable tracking then a stepped attenuator is the only way to go . They are bulky and expensive. The dual stepping version with only one pair of resistors on line at any time are reputed to be the best but are twice as expensive.

Linear law pots are, by far, the more accurate of stereo trackers.
You can convert these to a form of log law with a faking resistor.
Choose a lin about 10times bigger than you want and add a faking resistor about 10% to 15% of the pot value from wiper to ground. Down side is a variable input impedance with wiper position but a low source impedance should not be troubled with this.
Try a lin plastic with faking and tell us what you think.

Some decades ago a British audio journalist did an article on passive attenuator with a cap across some part of it to control (improve) the high frequency pass ability and reported really good and consistent results. Try a search on passives and see if you can find some data.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2006, 01:03 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
I was looking at offerings by Bourns- cermet and conductive plastic. Seems no one stocks the useful higher values. They also don't have any dual section ones. Mouser and Digikey can order them in large quantities, but it is a little pricey.

I am hoping to find a good linear pot that I could use the log faking with. I want something, though, that has the absolute best matching between channels. Since many dual section pots have poor channel matching, I thought that a pair of closely matched single pots would do better. I could use a few gears to use one know to control both pots.

I guess by the time I spend all the time and money to find a good pot and implement it effectively, I could have just bought a few stepped attenuators...
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th January 2006, 04:28 AM   #4
BrianL is offline BrianL  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Another option is 10-turn precision pots, such as Bourns 3540/3541
series and similar from Spectrol, etc. If you do a bit of work with
Excel, you'll find that the bottom couple turns of the total available
rotation provide a reasonable "law" for an audio attenuator. The
remaining 8 turns of rotation only provide a bit more gain, but
in most applications you never work with the volume control
near the top portion of its rotation anyway. I've looked at
log-faking using 10-turns and think it'll do more harm than good.

These pots are available in ganged versions, though I am
vitrually certain they're custom with large minimums.

Richard Marsh used the Spectrol equivalents years ago and just
had two separate single units. I would suppose he'd have used the
little counter/index gizmos to set them the same.
__________________
bel
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th January 2006, 12:20 AM   #5
testlab is offline testlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
testlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Panasonic offers some high quality pots through Digi-Key.
__________________
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you lay the blame.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2006, 07:11 AM   #6
klitgt is offline klitgt  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
klitgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denmark
http://www.hificollective.co.uk/comp...tiometers.html

They have different pots for sale, among other things...
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 07:15 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
SmarmyDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
I have had very good results with the Bourns 53-series pots. I have a bjillion 300K linear mono ones that I use everywhere. PM your address to me and I'll mail a couple to you. The datasheet can be found here. The part number is 53AAAB28B40. The '40' at the end of the part number is the code for 300K -- a nonstandard value.

Cheers,
-Casey Walsh
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 07:20 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
SmarmyDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Oh, and here are a couple pictures...

Picture 1
Picture 2

-Casey
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 07:41 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Rodeodave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in the alps
Blog Entries: 1
Hi,

these threads are quite interesting and informative:

In search of a perfect attenuator

& 1st link


Have you tried Farnell as a source for Bourns?
__________________
Gravity - Making the G since 13.7 billion B.C.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2006, 05:13 PM   #10
cetoole is offline cetoole  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
You might want to check this out. Doesnt come with mounting hardware, but you can get that real cheap. I ordered 10 packs, and look what I got, one in each.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
Pretty good deal I would say. Only problem with that site is it might end up costing you more than $20 to get that pot, because they have so many neat things there that I end up spending far more than I intended to.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So I did try all those different potentiometers Peter Daniel Chip Amps 308 12th August 2009 02:29 PM
Potentiometers BlairHatcher Chip Amps 22 9th February 2005 12:24 AM
Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? KT Class D 0 14th November 2004 06:51 AM
Cheaper, good quality potentiometers paulb Solid State 30 25th February 2004 02:30 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Page generated in 0.11666 seconds (78.64% PHP - 21.36% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio