|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
I am just wondering if the following bode diagram of a 2nd order filter (Q=0.707) is correct, Fo = 20Hz (blue line) and the green line is two 2nd order filters (multiplied together in MATLAB). Does this mean that the new Q = 0.5? Also does the response modelled by the filter look sharp enough to prevent over-excursion on my XLS12? The tech-sheets specify Q=0.7 and Fo=20Hz, but I just don't think 6dB/oct is enough, or perhaps a higher fall-off would be better. What do yous think?
__________________
There used to be a time, when penguins filled the sky! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First-Order Lowpass Filter with a Cap | Taterworks | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th October 2007 01:55 PM |
| My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? | philipreji | Solid State | 61 | 1st March 2007 04:50 PM |
| 1st order low-pass filter, which cap ? | Thmartin | Parts | 4 | 17th November 2005 08:37 AM |
| Help in measuring response of 4th order BP box | venki | Subwoofers | 13 | 14th November 2005 09:45 PM |
| 5th order filter chip | Russ White | Chip Amps | 8 | 9th June 2005 04:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06334 seconds (66.31% PHP - 33.69% MySQL) with 11 queries |