|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
I am about 1/2 through with building my transistor tester. When done, it will be able to show simultaneous readings of Vbe, Ib and Ic. Current capability for Ic will be up to several amperes, hopefully 10 or more amps. This is fine for power transistors but small signal has got me thinking, now that I have come to building that part.
Currently, I can set this thing up to read as high as 1.9999A Ib. (never anticipate reaching that though! What *minimum* level of base current should I consider when testing transistors for audio equipment? p.s., when this is done, stand by for some DIY amplification!
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
it depends on what level of resolution you want at the lower Ib currents. If you test a signal transistor at Ie = 1mA and gain is say 800 then Ib = 1.25uA. I think with very low Ie and high gain you might just get down to Ib min > 400nA. When matching transistors, is two significant figures close enough for you? or do you think you would ever need three significant figues? So your answer is either 100nA or 10nA for a resolution. Absolute accuracy here is not imperative but repeatable resolution is important.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
Christer: The design is not quite finalized (obviously). It could be AC but I am thinking two (or more) transistors that have similar properties at several levels of DC will have similar properites with AC as well.
AndrewT: Wow that's pretty low current. If I gave it a full-scale range of 1.9999mA, the resolution is 100nA... I think that should be good enough for me. Unfortunately it means minor revisions to the plans but it should be doable. Actually, it means a pretty simple variation now that I think of it, but this chassis is getting tighter and tighter inside. Thanks for the responses guys. I am trying to get this done right once and never again. I was working on it during slow times at work... the fact that it's been over a year tells you how much slow time we've had at work... So that means now is the time to throw open the door to suggestions. What features would your dream/ideal transistor tester have?
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Quote:
Well you did ask!
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
The de Luxe version would be to control it from the PC so you can use the PC as a curve tracer. Then there are plenty of things you could do in software, like extracting derived parameters, matching on arbitrary parameters etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
No really, swing for the fences guys. Solid-gold wires anyone?
Okay, I did ask. The thermostatically controlled heatsink... I can do that with parts on the shelf already. Mount a screw clamp and it's done. I'll have to think about that some. It gets to 75deg. C in the current configuration, but I am pretty sure I can adjust it up or down a bit. Variable temperature is likely not going to happen in this implementation. I was doing some calculations last night... for 100nA, I'm looking at some pretty huge gain on the voltage to get to the full-scale for my meter... Time fore multi-stage low noise low-offset buffering action I think. I toyed with a peak/hold circuit setup, but that is unlikely to make it in there unless I start matching a buncho transistors and find it would alleviate a huge hassle. I can't see it being worth that much effort to remember 2 or 3 numbers long enough to write them down (yet). For a *manual* trasistor tester, any other ideas?
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I hope you are not talking about amplifying up to give a full scale reading of 100nA. My suggestion was for a resolution of 100nA or 10nA. This will be the last digit on your readout. I recall your scale was 1.9999mA =1999.9uA. the last digit is already 100nA but I followed up by saying that it should be repeatable.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
CTM yes I was not thinking straight when I was thinking of the x1BILLION multiplication! please forgive the 2AM maths! We are still on the same page after all, even if half-asleep while reading it...
I did a lot of calculating and came to the conclusion that such a level of resolution would actually be seen by the amplifier's input and I'll want to test for it in such a case. MSD 1mV is LSD 100nV... much less amplification required... fortunately... I am considering, leaning toward and liking the maths for nice round numbers for my resistances which will limit max. current to 60mA Ic... does anyone think I should go higher than this? Oh yes, AndrewT, I just realized that I didn't answer one of your questions... I think I would like 2 significant digits of resolution. Wait, that gets me back to 10nA LSD on my readout. OK guys give me another day or two to figure out how to do the current reading. p.s. I did some looking around the web and 'transistor testers' are mostly a completely different feature set to this one... I think I should start calling it a transistor matcher, since that's what I'll be doing with it anyhow...
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Anyone who purchases a PMD1208LS from Measurement Computing ($99 I think) can have the code (written in Softwire with Visual Basic. Net) for this transistor tester -- the analog outs will source 15ma Max so there is a bit of jiggering for larger devices -- of course you can use almost any of the MCC USB devices:
![]() i could interface an RS232 label printer -- but then would have to write code for all the bells and whistles. the Measurement Computing data acquisition card could also be used in the bench power supply which I described a few weeks ago. All you have to do is load a different program for the device. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 transistor current source | Omicron | Parts | 16 | 22nd February 2006 09:02 AM |
| LM317 with a parallel transistor for current? | Progg70 | Power Supplies | 2 | 31st August 2005 05:01 PM |
| too much current thru transistor | xplod1236 | Parts | 27 | 29th May 2004 04:09 AM |
| transistor tester | janey | Solid State | 0 | 4th January 2002 02:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13053 seconds (84.07% PHP - 15.93% MySQL) with 11 queries |