|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hongkong
|
1. 100% Tin
or 2. 60 % Tin + 40% Lead or suggestions ?? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
60/40 unless you want to melt all your components and buy a new iron.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
For high-rel applications variants with up to a few% of silver and copper can be used, but they require different flux, which MUST be cleaned off. Actually, this is a good idea in general.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
60/40 or if you like to spend more 63/37 "eutectic". Clean off all flux as
ilimzn stated. I even have a 5lb roll of Kester 44 I use on old radios. -Chris |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
|
I've used 95 tin/5 antimony for years without issues though my latest PE order that arrives tomorrow does have a 1/2 lb of 60/40 in it
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hongkong
|
Which flux to use if needed ??
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
No extra flux is needed unless you like to make a mess and/or you are trying to use components that have been sitting around since 1943.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
That's not strictly true. It helps on new boards (I get a better wet) and is needed with smt work. Not unless you like chasing down solder bridges. Clean with lacquer thinner and a tooth brush. Of course you can pay more for commercial canned products.
-Chris |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
Solder wire intended for electronics normally has the required flux in the wire, it's just that SnPbCu and SnPbAg flux is a bit more agressive. There are SnAg solder wires that require >300 deg C and a separate flux (don't know what the composition is, when I used this, the flux bottle came bundled with the solder wire and actually cost almost as much as the expensive wire!).
There are flux sprays as well as eyedropper and brush-on liquids, which can be of great help for SMD components and NOS silvered or silver wire components when the silver has tarnished. In any case, I would take any flux residue off the board. Flux is normally heat activated, but that only means it's chemically agressive action is slowed down a lot at room temperature - in essence, it WILL eventually degrade the board and/or attract moisture and partciles, it will just take a long time. Still, it's really not a big investment to clean it off and you get a pristine board which will never have problems of that kind. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Amen to that. Be clean, how can you inspect the board otherwise?
-Chris |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fry Solder? | jol50 | Parts | 0 | 25th November 2007 11:44 PM |
| Best solder to use | rtarbell | Parts | 4 | 20th November 2005 02:05 AM |
| can I solder on this? | Duck-Twacy | Multi-Way | 9 | 24th February 2004 01:46 PM |
| how do you solder? | theChris | Equipment & Tools | 15 | 2nd January 2003 11:55 AM |
| Solder again | Christer | Parts | 13 | 6th December 2002 01:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10804 seconds (76.62% PHP - 23.38% MySQL) with 10 queries |